From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <ryan@mounce.com.au>
Received: from mail-pl0-x234.google.com (mail-pl0-x234.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::234])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D9EB3CB35
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 23:49:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: by mail-pl0-x234.google.com with SMTP id b12so22395794plm.3
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 20:49:17 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=mounce.com.au; s=google;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
 :cc; bh=Xur6I9ci/Bu9mtwaQNcu/4qGdL8jpIN4Ysavb1OkXlo=;
 b=M3/8xX13ydhxGNZAOTTLLFcoaOiWsnA8AImccLEgjqkZ8mdPAQlZprlDFFt1yEv2E8
 vwienC7IOvcma8uC5qGBM40c2nJO/sjz0nTfwX0h3SfiOEoJsXmXiFcQHykoVBkS7dQz
 Su1wy33mlmfgNY7+7Z+dFgIuLSkCS/Gpidjm48XsOd7eg/CrTjn/epb4U8eZ5vkXB5aT
 9z68EtpO9yT8j3fwBO3Vl/6JvS+lTwJq6PQXTvMDzCtQMT0yeIRF/4C+RJezR7hTo+dC
 MmUPY7UCYiceqilZtD2xKAhI/QF6sSdrHHEcE214ctprABjs98iYQC8aIm9OBB0t/CS9
 Y88Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
 h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
 :message-id:subject:to:cc;
 bh=Xur6I9ci/Bu9mtwaQNcu/4qGdL8jpIN4Ysavb1OkXlo=;
 b=nYCwzkOE8mc0EMLbJROFPVImabuj3vRVf2kaoj6Qs1Qdvt62HHnutzNptao5SeR90M
 +r2OTwttlRLXRJvV0lCQgSNYDV4H7SoT528asT+Ze65cdjO2yevseo3B37YtNfr9hKOM
 CYe81rmrhoKEx4+HmTSfAbH5CwRshzgIpHp86HO03MkcdJLOfXlu3qw+ZQgWI48okf35
 HswWq8gNWZiwfCNb+T+W0UuqbuoDw7/HrZNuXS6DSKnl9KhxXlu8i5YpL2GEwFkTvVHV
 AypHAMkHP67wwVLoUv4hJn4pbwpF6qJJ2nBlmojdmncfUkm9lTDNzVhZzNj0amp8wrkZ
 E5YQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mLWG7YARMMHuXz8YEsLVuRD0/IlMbGNhMKxvk8rK0WqzYYGA3cx
 YhpfcfcK+ZnUdl8hJFUmKbvpVT69DZzBBxgr5riBLA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBouiDAzmjzo3jrL7thM5MVksvs1j+rhd/jMqNjpKq3kdXThcsVE3P2QZT9vkN3KKxI5wUg1Ek/RYxuEmFTXne18=
X-Received: by 10.84.133.44 with SMTP id 41mr32943417plf.188.1514522956796;
 Thu, 28 Dec 2017 20:49:16 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.100.187.3 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Dec 2017 20:49:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Originating-IP: [1.123.16.4]
In-Reply-To: <CAJq5cE0NpRqZMn7R0xA_UCjTFgSva=J=GAxAvfsLRQTycp66+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <3657B600-407D-46A5-BE00-BE0088096FA7@gmail.com>
 <CAN+fvRbsK-ep+-J05UUbPMxk55k8BV5TZiBa1FwZPYPQ3VwqEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAN+fvRb7Gz23QujkMG=UTC5Dwb4NnK5fYhko1aA9Hqtjd+rbAQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJq5cE0NpRqZMn7R0xA_UCjTFgSva=J=GAxAvfsLRQTycp66+g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ryan Mounce <ryan@mounce.com.au>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 15:19:01 +1030
Message-ID: <CAN+fvRbur8HpTsPkK3UhFUfwvfjqJgYc-rucxwOTWGrWUGULjQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Cc: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Win10 Updates vs cake
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2017 04:49:17 -0000

On 22 December 2017 at 15:56, Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com> wrote:
> Those threads are about 18 months old.  Is it still happening the same way,
> or has it become a large number of well-behaved TCP streams?  Cake in
> ingress mode can cope with the latter pretty well.

At least in my case I am using the latest revision of the cobalt
branch and running cake in ingress mode.

>
> - Jonathan Morton