From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-x230.google.com (mail-it0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADA503B25E for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 19:02:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-it0-x230.google.com with SMTP id e62so109169258ita.1 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:02:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=mXGB+CsBfj4BNOIbgEiUAAxfgCERt4i33Uw58LU6Qvg=; b=jplzBQSj1L7Wy3yxx8Tp806kukmTEEmCRctnPK7oVGAr+BKOLPIG/8AjBi7vXvBXib DKz++Yl79hwd1iuc1c0Liusfg2UiKasLqnG85AhoOVWwWyyey6HkzApsPp5poAfkQJdx +Bquh371jaEa9Lju+lkEAmH4z1MyGDm67f09PFicqL8IVK+rKaqGai4+ycEE7+qA7+69 Z1b+fH6RIg6lC1l9Daljv56oevllBFjb9moYInYOQQt8KjoKJ4vc51JF96/WDSL+pI5L /aeptbjaDCwAYqKf4FGwnd+B65kAqbu2acou/M50e5SHg3oU7H+4mj4d5rBODmnRMgFH GpyA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=mXGB+CsBfj4BNOIbgEiUAAxfgCERt4i33Uw58LU6Qvg=; b=ea8Oe0XVv7DSYyy53Qo5z4T5sOOdfiCWucJKiemVV6QjepWbxgSrRcNP9A56scJnHU umz9K9GsXlnuwisfBLQm1Ho1KXwGH02Q3eA4hkI0RgJtRUpm5DHdjyNMRHqlBxmxClNZ uaiTxrWJ7K8weFdvcMgXd6VlPQME7noS9rq91oKuswuJa17oBJe0cSNrx/UauXfwFYiY e3YidmTwEc3cVbyqNb2xMhV7cGVfWDlCsuR7LZDblSYbVqLiBTbmeCVAUX7wP4lddG5V 694TOJt/7WBuDWNuUfo9iutC+MMmQ48rs6HsqQ7F8W3mD7k5PlGdz80WBT28eVGqVTn2 oKMg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKnHoBM9WoB1M6t95shccWjwWJr9R0b6JK8NKslwUSTGTntjEkPIyhXR7Pd7zuplSmJIysBAe5/QJwxHQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.36.2.71 with SMTP id 68mr487388itu.38.1464822156175; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 16:02:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.243.8 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 16:02:36 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 00:02:36 +0100 Message-ID: From: Alan Jenkins To: Dave Taht Cc: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Bloat] new public web tests for bufferbloat X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 23:02:36 -0000 On 01/06/2016, Alan Jenkins wrote: > On 01/06/2016, Dave Taht wrote: >> see: http://labs.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/ >> >> (can't test myself, not being in england - can someone there test it >> and post results/screenshots?) > > http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/results.html?id=1464821570474383655 > > (OpenWrt SQM. ISP _download_ is un-bloated already, for reasonable > numbers of streams. Though even with SQM, downloading multiple > torrents in Transmission can cause both latency up to 100ms & packet > loss). oops... the results page above omits the bufferbloat result. The original result has a sharing button that requires a Facebook login. Here's the screenshot https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/49925445/bufferbloat.net/thinkbroadband.com/2016-06-01%20labs.thinkbroadband.com%20speedtest.png >> and: >> >> https://sourceforge.net/speedtest/ >> >> which is quite pretty, if mildly confusing. >> >> >> I have issues with the language and testing methodologies, of course, >> but it is good to see these arrive. When will speedtest.net get it >> right?