From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-x231.google.com (mail-it0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C4273B25E for ; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 18:58:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail-it0-x231.google.com with SMTP id z189so96528061itg.0 for ; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 15:58:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=Wn95NWXxhc2ZuGKGNnEMPg2T6SFHYSJKxd9Dl9RKB6I=; b=loDflBcetJXJZMbLjP6QIXjVKEvDUTcjgUj8NoNguBXobXvmRLkfwnc2ur4q123N4U xyrYy6W4PfmSNn9luezGuQM2GbTcdn1dCrYiojVzykUl3m1LfU0pMGtLN0hjdILf2Q05 3TfliUR9OpCTf6zf1+KkOqWcdiVtorKbb8wLHwH1E5Au5CqwjwGkEUPHsevIqCC5ZkfU tsTgepLzh3aEK3Bh7QD1Ude4ys7tOR+R91grbVzs2BKwLmhw5ukO0/c4ruaNwD4Sdfzu qPLAORp5vOJ0uuBNpfy4UKQOMlbCjydmQ9ufL9p/6Gd2xHK0qzbqVigq3cU1oSZU+aqL twZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=Wn95NWXxhc2ZuGKGNnEMPg2T6SFHYSJKxd9Dl9RKB6I=; b=OCTHdbuLVdqybAAGC1MsWBK1FbQVCMhGzZL6/RXLW/gckbFrB/7mHy54/ZtBfXideI RDcVrfPNFbNdzbN1NoGb2JzoDEUO1mBtB8nznT6n5dCmPoeESMybve/k6kdKlNZUpCeq gkURVKjuSxGcHAMDInKDgadeLGztbidSUdu0HkS27pDdfHX8MfEHmi67DD7Jr47lmr4H tfqzBDZWfV04qcQ7BreWfVBimNIJWxkOPxLqUnwZRW53XuQbHs8KdUI6FbaT3ad65yZ6 pors8MfED1qGxbIx+cTXTNo2MFpz2V/PQSzinfrRi+iRZYkiTMYkqV+WsjmuARfosDRi c5hQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tK/nY+opPwKJpg4ZGC+rmxQ/XigPBvlvyBXy8yo1fJUYu4Blea3P57u6VzPcgyWvu2jTRQVWrBLcuWcZg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.36.2.71 with SMTP id 68mr470369itu.38.1464821880447; Wed, 01 Jun 2016 15:58:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.50.243.8 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 15:58:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 23:58:00 +0100 Message-ID: From: Alan Jenkins To: Dave Taht Cc: bloat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Bloat] new public web tests for bufferbloat X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 22:58:01 -0000 On 01/06/2016, Dave Taht wrote: > see: http://labs.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/ > > (can't test myself, not being in england - can someone there test it > and post results/screenshots?) http://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/results.html?id=1464821570474383655 (OpenWrt SQM. ISP _download_ is un-bloated already, for reasonable numbers of streams. Though even with SQM, downloading multiple torrents in Transmission can cause both latency up to 100ms & packet loss). > and: > > https://sourceforge.net/speedtest/ > > which is quite pretty, if mildly confusing. > > > I have issues with the language and testing methodologies, of course, > but it is good to see these arrive. When will speedtest.net get it > right?