Hi Grenville,

Thanks for the email.

I have replied inline below:

On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 2:28 AM grenville armitage <gja.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Mohit,
>
> Thanks for doing the comparison!
>
> As for "*any other material related to this?*" I've had a dig around, and
> there is not a lot. Rasool (the FreeBSD fq-pie author) did write up a
> university tech report in April 2016, "*Dummynet AQM v0.2 – CoDel,
> FQ-CoDel, PIE and FQ-PIE for FreeBSD’s ipfw/dummynet framework*" (wayback
> machine link
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20241018123533/http://caia.swin.edu.au/reports/160418A/CAIA-TR-160418A.pdf>).
> There's also a small mention in an LCN 2017 paper titled "*Characterising
> LEDBAT Performance Through Bottlenecks Using PIE, FQ-CoDel and FQ-PIE
> Active Queue Management*" (ieee link
> <http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/LCN.2017.22>, author preprint
> <http://gja.space4me.com/things/ralsaadi-lcn2017-preprint-aqm_on_ledbat-preprint-4oct17.pdf>).
> Hope these are of some (historical) interest to your I-D (and the wider
> bufferbloat mailing list, too).
>

Thanks for sharing these links. I will go through the material.


> I'm unaware of any production deployment of FreeBSD's fq-pie.
>

Thanks for letting me know.

I presented the FQ-PIE ID in the recently concluded IETF at tsvwg. I
believe there was interest in the group to have a specification for FQ-PIE.

It would be great if you could share your views on the tsvwg mailing list
when you get a chance.

Thanks and Regards,
Mohit P. Tahiliani