From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-la0-x234.google.com (mail-la0-x234.google.com
	[IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::234])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5460121F520;
	Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f52.google.com with SMTP id ty20so3125775lab.11
	for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to;
	bh=Cswd9OVMpganI3DMKeHJJ33s+JT0iSI7C4gg7lvl6+Y=;
	b=gVWWXOlrSC0EdI4xr4OgPQyJ4Kwv3Yue5pdIOqmL34fdAYD5WO4a2t2eG3KLoP73Mm
	U9+ZG2nqIVWmDsaS0vqBNbN4KpbQdKkt4SNjGx/+IKQxSZlp85B/5Sto3O2tjpPl+go2
	aAFpvkWQfF+u9dmO6FOof98thBbet3J/fzp4J3o2+444yenuG4vTj1YGS3DNGW1wHT2J
	zA2Rs1yd3e/KTeOXiMagcyqXAeafFgHpCbYh7tzujPk7kICoCkV3vMwjXk2EcUnCPRUM
	ZEKwsn/IzdnJfJcfH4+h3BIYMF1ywij0Xg9n59EH8x84IZWQmEx5P4eola2np94dHpkz
	UmHA==
X-Received: by 10.153.6.39 with SMTP id cr7mr12478813lad.66.1409332508624;
	Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:15:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (188-67-224-93.bb.dnainternet.fi.
	[188.67.224.93])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bc5sm330713lab.30.2014.08.29.10.15.06
	for <multiple recipients>
	(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
	Fri, 29 Aug 2014 10:15:07 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALQXh-Pkqh6Wq9xc9ky0ruztu74ziUoiaiG0LPr+DVLtDqz4mQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 20:15:05 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <CB99B8FA-D46D-4070-9259-2B4B1415FC6B@gmail.com>
References: <CALQXh-Pkqh6Wq9xc9ky0ruztu74ziUoiaiG0LPr+DVLtDqz4mQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Comcast upped service levels -> WNDR3800 can't cope...
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2014 17:15:12 -0000


On 29 Aug, 2014, at 7:57 pm, Aaron Wood wrote:

> That's roughly 10K cpu cycles per packet, which seems like an awful =
lot.

I could analyse the chief algorithms to see how many clock cycles per =
packet are theoretically possible - a number one could approach with an =
embedded core in the NIC, rather than as part of a full kernel.

 - Jonathan Morton