From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <chromatix99@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f43.google.com (mail-lpp01m010-f43.google.com
	[209.85.215.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
	Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK))
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C718D20221E;
	Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:20:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagk11 with SMTP id k11so5760479lag.16
	for <multiple recipients>; Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc
	:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
	bh=MGh259otOLFyR2sBKDJq3rvgpPq7+77jeldEBh8ZMtc=;
	b=eosNWmW5sF1Cr05hFQEgcpxex8KigHZcMiQp8dqyGKACQLmPsFJ8N9r9vh1FDMWvv8
	WqIVTrJAtRwNYeIjaZcRmhWBIX/t84dbEdbjt6ug/mJ6XdljBPjvSTjkVBOOSGlxj05d
	fG474Of4ysMea/60MPYkMCJIRBn9DIsdUgSpr/NvEd7lgTlNmV8iMZ8Il2UlDOY/KbOd
	P+pH4VHXWTAW7QztcSVtvmuu7TAOl6HYko+3n6zMR49BxsityvDsHhM0FWSBkjlx4q+I
	JWLIgYc+BS09gNLKZKTdePePuw6EcaWOonIrHdVd+yvCgxyN70OnlZM8snUY6SvZKeQM
	TAsg==
Received: by 10.152.104.44 with SMTP id gb12mr7764618lab.29.1345285255363;
	Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:20:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (xdsl-83-150-84-172.nebulazone.fi.
	[83.150.84.172])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i4sm2265172lbg.17.2012.08.18.03.20.54
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Sat, 18 Aug 2012 03:20:54 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <502F6279.1090708@etorok.net>
Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 13:20:52 +0300
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D247743C-68C7-41A8-80C1-5F51302054D1@gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw50MeqWH6TVKditFGfg-V-mOi-UUtsABqd+WHs2vedHQw@mail.gmail.com>
	<502E064C.50305@etorok.net>
	<CAA93jw6JGFb9Eqh9tTdy2DY6fsNDDKpq391JQqirezoU4aJCSQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<502F6279.1090708@etorok.net>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= <edwin+ml-cerowrt@etorok.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] cerowrt 3.3.8-17: nice latency
	improvements, some issues with bind
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2012 10:20:58 -0000


On 18 Aug, 2012, at 12:38 pm, T=F6r=F6k Edwin wrote:

> Shouldn't wireless N be able to do 200 - 300 Mbps though? If I enable =
debugging in iwl4965 I see that it
> starts TX aggregation, so not sure whats wrong (router or laptop?). =
With encryption off I can get at most 160 Mbps.

That's only the raw data rate - many non-ideal effects conspire to =
reduce this by at least half in practice.

I don't think anyone has ever seen the full theoretical throughput on =
wireless - at this point it's just a marketing number to indicate "this =
one is newer and better" to the technically illiterate.

 - Jonathan