General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>, jb <justinbeech@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] dslreports bufferbloat tests
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 18:16:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D32BD704.12F664%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw4MDY16x3-e6bdejdiT1AC_KMUg=fEd+BDU=RL3ZARsrg@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/6/16, 12:30 PM, "Bloat on behalf of Dave Taht"
<bloat-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net on behalf of dave.taht@gmail.com>
wrote:

>Does anyone know how these nutrition labels are calculated?

This is a tough question because AFAIK the FCC has not provided too much
guidance. But I believe we can use the data from the FCC¹s SamKnows (MBA)
panel and that is considered a ³safe harbor². So my guess is any ISP
covered by the FCC MBA platform will use the SamKnows data to be covered
by the safe harbor. But at my company not all of our tiers are covered but
the FCC MBA program, so we and others have a gap to fill.

For tiers of service (speeds) and ISPs not covered by the FCC MBA platform
then one has to develop a methodology and document it and be prepared to
defend it with the FCC. And it will need to be documented in a reference
linked to from the disclosure.

My guess, though IANAL, is that the non-MBA numbers ISPs use will be
refined over time through the back-and-forth of complaint & inquiries
until it becomes more clear what the smaller number of acceptable
measurement methodologies are, and this will take quite some time (and
perhaps be a bit messy).

We shall see!

Jason


      parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-07 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-06  1:04 Dave Taht
2016-04-06  1:33 ` Brandon Applegate
2016-04-06  2:21   ` Dave Taht
2016-04-06  3:19     ` jb
2016-04-06 15:30       ` Dave Taht
2016-04-06 16:08         ` Kelvin Edmison
2016-04-07 18:13           ` Livingood, Jason
2016-04-07 18:23             ` Livingood, Jason
2016-04-20  6:06             ` jb
2016-04-20  6:10               ` Dave Taht
2016-04-20 12:43               ` Jonathan Morton
2016-04-20 22:53                 ` jb
2016-04-21  2:22                   ` Jonathan Morton
2016-04-07  2:06         ` jb
2016-04-07  2:14           ` Jonathan Morton
2016-04-07 18:16         ` Livingood, Jason [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D32BD704.12F664%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com \
    --to=jason_livingood@comcast.com \
    --cc=Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
    --cc=justinbeech@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox