From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84004200B33 for ; Sat, 7 Apr 2012 10:10:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by wgbge7 with SMTP id ge7so2435940wgb.28 for ; Sat, 07 Apr 2012 10:10:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=tL6DAJZAN6nG3Nh+DNAMFqn9o2gidiPza+2sDLy5t5Y=; b=IzWga5gFdDfhawPwGjmoWMncqUqfs43nUgPjWlg8azEJdQXStSeLH7KMWCu2xbiEq3 qYfoxwd43xiv7mXve2DxYiQGUV3BvlV4sPTEQXjVOssZtZ+sjtEhDwS9/nb/AaMEQMMs 3IvSpz8O3lvQg6kf8m7nUH465hhqqgmd4UbPQUl3a98vZ3V4gqbnk/6qn7VyX6bdomQl 0sxkAUrN32bfnIYOgJPs4BxOTuCEPdUHTtAOLEtixQdp/BaQS4nMw69wHJQhLMRVdsjo HZ9hzQ6M/rsq3kVRrs4c72RD8+Zmnj3ER7K2jlWbX51b7mP4NURxTuzVQjrMbGdqltut +eZw== Received: by 10.216.201.104 with SMTP id a82mr913101weo.100.1333818652703; Sat, 07 Apr 2012 10:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.14] (xdsl-83-150-84-172.nebulazone.fi. [83.150.84.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h8sm25918899wix.4.2012.04.07.10.10.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 07 Apr 2012 10:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: <20120407153548.GC21452@uio.no> Date: Sat, 7 Apr 2012 20:10:50 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20120406213725.GA12641@uio.no> <20120406222138.GB12641@uio.no> <1333811327.30705.4.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20120407153548.GC21452@uio.no> To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] Best practices for paced TCP on Linux? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Apr 2012 17:10:56 -0000 On 7 Apr, 2012, at 6:35 pm, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 08:25:18AM -0700, Dave Taht wrote: >> The test HD tcp stream is up at >>=20 >> http://cesur.tg12.gathering.org:9094/ >=20 > That's the SD stream. http://stream.tg12.gathering.org/ has HD etc. I've got this running over here: 12Mbps ADSL2+ in Finland (not at all far from Norway), via a standard = modem-router rather than my usual Linux system. The LAN segment is = entirely wired full-duplex Ethernet. The receiver is a Core i7 Windows = PC running the latest stable VLC, so it's not short of ability to play = what it receives. And it's dropping more frames than it's playing. - Jonathan Morton