From: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>
To: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com>
Cc: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>,
"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
BBR Development <bbr-dev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [bbr-dev] Re: "BBR" TCP patches submitted to linux kernel
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 01:49:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D6F6A4FA-E11B-44B5-B550-0EE4D0B7FFFB@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK6E8=eCBzLxnmEvq5h5yggCbiX_F4whrE1EG6UMfO6Wq5SNRg@mail.gmail.com>
> On 2 Nov, 2016, at 01:13, 'Yuchung Cheng' via BBR Development <bbr-dev@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> We are curious why you choose the single-queued AQM. Is it just for the sake of testing?
Not to speak for them, but single-queue AQM is the most likely implementation for high-speed hardware. DOCSIS 3.1, for example, specifies PIE for client upstream, not any form of FQ-PIE. It therefore remains an important use-case for interop testing.
- Jonathan Morton
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-01 23:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-16 21:04 [Bloat] " Dave Taht
2016-09-16 21:11 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-09-16 21:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-16 22:29 ` Dave Taht
2016-09-29 11:24 ` Mário Sérgio Fujikawa Ferreira
2016-09-29 19:43 ` Dave Täht
2016-09-29 20:35 ` Aaron Wood
2016-09-30 8:12 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-09-30 14:16 ` Aaron Wood
2016-09-29 21:23 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-09-30 1:54 ` Mario Ferreira
2016-09-30 3:50 ` Dave Täht
2016-09-30 4:29 ` Aaron Wood
2016-09-29 23:26 ` Benjamin Cronce
2016-09-30 1:58 ` Mario Ferreira
2016-10-21 8:47 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-21 10:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-21 10:42 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-21 10:47 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-21 10:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-21 10:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-21 11:03 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-21 11:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-21 11:45 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-27 17:04 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-27 17:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-27 17:33 ` Dave Taht
2016-10-27 17:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-27 17:59 ` Dave Taht
2016-10-27 17:57 ` Yuchung Cheng
2016-10-27 18:14 ` Dave Taht
2016-10-27 21:30 ` [Bloat] [bbr-dev] " Yuchung Cheng
2016-11-01 23:13 ` Yuchung Cheng
2016-11-01 23:49 ` Jonathan Morton [this message]
2016-11-02 9:27 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-11-02 17:21 ` Klatsky, Carl
2016-11-02 18:48 ` Dave Täht
2016-11-25 12:51 ` [Bloat] " Bernd Paysan
2016-10-21 10:50 ` Zhen Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D6F6A4FA-E11B-44B5-B550-0EE4D0B7FFFB@gmail.com \
--to=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=bbr-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=sgunderson@bigfoot.com \
--cc=ycheng@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox