From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: "Dave Täht" <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] an internet stress test
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2023 17:03:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D74CCE92-1AEC-4BA0-8A42-9D1B9EC48628@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5AevJABN=d_yJNQ1PX4r+1+K5-OwgW+gqVYq9kMROMHQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1244 bytes --]
Hi Dave,
from Germany (on link sqm-shaped to 105/36 gross rate -> max achievable TCP goodput IPv4: 98.3/33.7, IPv6: 96.9/33.2):
The thing runs pretty short (as most throughput tests) and the latency is measured without load.
Under Safari te sharing feature seems not to work:
https://wifi.wtf/results/undefined
undefined is not a link
IMHO the FAQ is amusing and not wrong, the tests has clear visuals, but at the end of the day it seems pretty much a run-of-the-mill throughput test with servers likely only in NA...
The results themselves look OK, if not great, a 120ms path and local cross traffic take their toll.
> On Apr 16, 2023, at 02:23, Dave Taht via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net> wrote:
>
> I was aware of this one, but it was not until today that I read the
> faq. Pretty good test. Hilarious FAQ. I would be interested of course
> to see how accurate the test is from various locations?
>
> https://wifi.wtf/wtfaq/
>
> --
> AMA March 31: https://www.broadband.io/c/broadband-grant-events/dave-taht
> Dave Täht CEO, TekLibre, LLC
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
[-- Attachment #2.1: Type: text/html, Size: 2240 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2.2: Screen Shot 2023-04-16 at 16.49.03.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 326369 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-16 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-16 0:23 Dave Taht
2023-04-16 15:03 ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D74CCE92-1AEC-4BA0-8A42-9D1B9EC48628@gmx.de \
--to=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox