From: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
To: "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
"Eric Dumazet (edumazet@google.com)" <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] "BBR" TCP patches submitted to linux kernel
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:25:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB4PR07MB3480116C7B8D56A70FDEAF7C2AA0@DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
Hi Eric + others
Cubic : I would believe that the main reason why Cubic give such bad results lies in the HyStart algorithm, I have sofar not seen any major issues with the Cubic congestion avoidance algorithm, provided of course that proper AQM is deployed.
RFC3540 : This actually in the process of becoming historic (see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation/ ), also you will notice that I am on favor of this draft as I am among the folks who wish to free up ECT(1) for L4S use.
/Ingemar
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:52:08 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> Cc: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>, bloat
> <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Subject: Re: [Bloat] "BBR" TCP patches submitted to linux kernel
> Message-ID:
> <1477590728.7065.231.camel@edumazet-
> glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 10:33 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
>
> > At the moment my biggest beef with BBR is that it ignores ECN entirely
> > (and yet negotiates it).
>
> Note that switching cubic to any other CC like BBR is allowed at any
> time, way after ECN was negotiated.
>
> So BBR can not solve the issue you mention in a reliable way.
>
> There must be a reason sysctl_tcp_ecn default value is 2 on linux [1],
> don't you think ???
>
> _You_ chose to change this sysctl, do not blame BBR for being silly !
>
> ECN was a nice attempt, but suffers from implementation bugs.
>
> For a start, linux does not implement RFC 3540.
>
> If someone cares enough of ECN, then it should cook linux patches to
> implement RFC 3540. Hint hint hint.
>
> Then you need to make sure all the nodes between your peers are not
> messing with ECN.
>
> BBR simply works, because it is a sender side thing.
> You do not have to fix everything in the Internet.
>
> [1]
> Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
> tcp_ecn - INTEGER
> Control use of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) by TCP.
> ECN is used only when both ends of the TCP connection indicate
> support for it. This feature is useful in avoiding losses due
> to congestion by allowing supporting routers to signal
> congestion before having to drop packets.
> Possible values are:
> 0 Disable ECN. Neither initiate nor accept ECN.
> 1 Enable ECN when requested by incoming connections and
> also request ECN on outgoing connection attempts.
> 2 Enable ECN when requested by incoming connections
> but do not request ECN on outgoing connections.
> Default: 2
>
>
>
>
***********************
next reply other threads:[~2016-10-27 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-27 19:25 Ingemar Johansson S [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-16 21:04 Dave Taht
2016-09-16 21:11 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-09-16 21:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-16 22:29 ` Dave Taht
2016-09-29 11:24 ` Mário Sérgio Fujikawa Ferreira
2016-09-29 19:43 ` Dave Täht
2016-09-29 20:35 ` Aaron Wood
2016-09-30 8:12 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-09-30 14:16 ` Aaron Wood
2016-09-29 21:23 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-09-30 1:54 ` Mario Ferreira
2016-09-30 3:50 ` Dave Täht
2016-09-30 4:29 ` Aaron Wood
2016-09-29 23:26 ` Benjamin Cronce
2016-09-30 1:58 ` Mario Ferreira
2016-10-21 8:47 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-21 10:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-21 10:42 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-21 10:47 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-21 10:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-21 10:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-21 11:03 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-21 11:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-21 11:45 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-27 17:04 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-27 17:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-27 17:33 ` Dave Taht
2016-10-27 17:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-27 17:59 ` Dave Taht
2016-10-27 17:57 ` Yuchung Cheng
2016-10-27 18:14 ` Dave Taht
2016-11-25 12:51 ` Bernd Paysan
2016-10-21 10:50 ` Zhen Cao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DB4PR07MB3480116C7B8D56A70FDEAF7C2AA0@DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com \
--to=ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox