General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
To: "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
	"Eric Dumazet (edumazet@google.com)" <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] "BBR" TCP patches submitted to linux kernel
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:25:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DB4PR07MB3480116C7B8D56A70FDEAF7C2AA0@DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> (raw)

Hi Eric + others 
Cubic : I would believe that the main reason why Cubic give such bad results lies in the HyStart algorithm, I have sofar not seen any major issues with the Cubic congestion avoidance algorithm, provided of course that proper AQM is deployed.

RFC3540 : This actually in the process of becoming historic (see https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-black-tsvwg-ecn-experimentation/ ), also you will notice that I am on favor of this draft as I am among the folks who wish to free up ECT(1) for L4S use.

/Ingemar

> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:52:08 -0700
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
> To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
> Cc: "Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@bigfoot.com>, bloat
> 	<bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
> Subject: Re: [Bloat] "BBR" TCP patches submitted to linux kernel
> Message-ID:
> 	<1477590728.7065.231.camel@edumazet-
> glaptop3.roam.corp.google.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> 
> On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 10:33 -0700, Dave Taht wrote:
> 
> > At the moment my biggest beef with BBR is that it ignores ECN entirely
> > (and yet negotiates it).
> 
> Note that switching cubic to any other CC like BBR is allowed at any
> time, way after ECN was negotiated.
> 
> So BBR can not solve the issue you mention in a reliable way.
> 
> There must be a reason sysctl_tcp_ecn default value is 2 on linux [1],
> don't you think ???
> 
> _You_ chose to change this sysctl, do not blame BBR for being silly !
> 
> ECN was a nice attempt, but suffers from implementation bugs.
> 
> For a start, linux does not implement RFC 3540.
> 
> If someone cares enough of ECN, then it should cook linux patches to
> implement RFC 3540. Hint hint hint.
> 
> Then you need to make sure all the nodes between your peers are not
> messing with ECN.
> 
> BBR simply works, because it is a sender side thing.
> You do not have to fix everything in the Internet.
> 
> [1]
> Documentation/networking/ip-sysctl.txt
> tcp_ecn - INTEGER
>         Control use of Explicit Congestion Notification (ECN) by TCP.
>         ECN is used only when both ends of the TCP connection indicate
>         support for it.  This feature is useful in avoiding losses due
>         to congestion by allowing supporting routers to signal
>         congestion before having to drop packets.
>         Possible values are:
>                 0 Disable ECN.  Neither initiate nor accept ECN.
>                 1 Enable ECN when requested by incoming connections and
>                   also request ECN on outgoing connection attempts.
>                 2 Enable ECN when requested by incoming connections
>                   but do not request ECN on outgoing connections.
>         Default: 2
> 
> 
> 
> 
***********************

             reply	other threads:[~2016-10-27 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-27 19:25 Ingemar Johansson S [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-09-16 21:04 Dave Taht
2016-09-16 21:11 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-09-16 21:14   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-09-16 22:29   ` Dave Taht
2016-09-29 11:24     ` Mário Sérgio Fujikawa Ferreira
2016-09-29 19:43       ` Dave Täht
2016-09-29 20:35         ` Aaron Wood
2016-09-30  8:12           ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-09-30 14:16             ` Aaron Wood
2016-09-29 21:23         ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-09-30  1:54         ` Mario Ferreira
2016-09-30  3:50           ` Dave Täht
2016-09-30  4:29             ` Aaron Wood
2016-09-29 23:26       ` Benjamin Cronce
2016-09-30  1:58         ` Mario Ferreira
2016-10-21  8:47 ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-21 10:28   ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-21 10:42     ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-21 10:47       ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-21 10:55         ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-21 10:52       ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-21 11:03         ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-21 11:40           ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-21 11:45             ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-27 17:04   ` Steinar H. Gunderson
2016-10-27 17:31     ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-27 17:33     ` Dave Taht
2016-10-27 17:52       ` Eric Dumazet
2016-10-27 17:59         ` Dave Taht
2016-10-27 17:57       ` Yuchung Cheng
2016-10-27 18:14         ` Dave Taht
2016-11-25 12:51           ` Bernd Paysan
2016-10-21 10:50 ` Zhen Cao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DB4PR07MB3480116C7B8D56A70FDEAF7C2AA0@DB4PR07MB348.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox