From: Colin Dearborn <Colin.Dearborn@sjrb.ca>
To: Aaron Wood <woody77@gmail.com>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun)
Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2017 14:50:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM5PR04MB1034A4BA6B47DDCFB094C9DB95660@DM5PR04MB1034.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALQXh-O+Nq3g6mNiDs-J1bA=VL3yynB0NQTyqHEUgnenPKc3iA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1817 bytes --]
This is my guess.
DSL reports uses many streams from different servers to achieve these speeds.
I’m assuming flent is a single stream, so you’re at the mercy of TCP receive windows and latency limiting how fast you can go on that single stream.
From: Bloat [mailto:bloat-bounces@lists.bufferbloat.net] On Behalf Of Aaron Wood
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 11:16 PM
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Bloat] different speeds on different ports? (benchmarking fun)
I don't have a full writeup yet, but wanted to ask if people on here have run into this.
I'm seeing a disparity between flent and the dslreports speed tests. On my connection at home (Comcast 150/12), I figured it was something related to the test implementations, but minor. But on a connect at a friend with business-class Comcast (300/12), we're seeing a huge difference. Flent can't seem to achieve more than 120Mbps, often with an early, couple-second hump at a much higher speed. But dslreports' speed tests gets the full 300Mbps.
In looking closer at my connection, with sqm (cake) turned off, I'm seeing ~180Mbps download with 500ms of bufferbloat when I use the dslreports test (http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/20805152).
Yet flent can't come close to that, even with the tcp_12down test:
[cid:image002.png@01D332B6.95FED960]
The current hypothesis that we have is that this is due to either traffic class, or the ports that traffic are running on. I've ruled out the ping streams, as a parallel set of netperf tcp_maerts downloads has the same 120Mbps roof.
It would be interesting if we could run some netperf tests using port 80/443 for the listening socket for the data connection (although if doing deep-packet inspection, we might need to use an actual HTTP transfer).
-Aaron
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5546 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: image002.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 38956 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-21 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-30 5:15 Aaron Wood
2017-09-21 2:06 ` Dave Taht
2017-09-21 2:34 ` Dave Taht
2017-09-21 10:58 ` Stefan Alfredsson
2017-09-21 11:16 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2017-09-21 12:51 ` Sebastian Moeller
2017-09-22 0:26 ` David Lang
2017-09-21 14:50 ` Colin Dearborn [this message]
2017-09-21 15:13 ` Aaron Wood
2017-09-21 15:16 ` Aaron Wood
2017-09-23 2:51 ` Aaron Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM5PR04MB1034A4BA6B47DDCFB094C9DB95660@DM5PR04MB1034.namprd04.prod.outlook.com \
--to=colin.dearborn@sjrb.ca \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=woody77@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox