From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: [Bloat] German Router maker implements and demonstrates ingress shaping
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2022 10:32:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E4B89295-8B80-44AC-93DA-2BE47ED86E6C@gmx.de> (raw)
Dear List,
in the spirit of some things might take a while, german router maker AVM just published a Video demonstrating the new ingress shaping feature of the firmware that is described as offering some sort of per-internal-host fairness (video is in German, sorry):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VCQnzHt5B0
The demonstration is't 100% perfect:
1) Demo without Ingress-Shaping:
Sync ~97: -> 97 * 64/65 * ((1500-20-20)/(1500+26)) = 91.3769533219*
Speedtest: 85
FTP: 91-85 = 6
2) Demo with Ingress Shaping:
Sync: ~100 * 64/65 * ((1500-20-20)/(1500+26)) = 94.2030446618* (the sync improved by 3 Mbps in between the two measurements**)
Speedtest: ~60
FPT: 94-60 = 34
So the expected share would be ~94/2 = 47 Mbps. But realistically going from a 6/85 = 0.071 ratio to a 34/60 = 0.567 ratio is likely to improve things for end users more than improving from 0.567 to closer to 1 would. I have no clue how they implement this, and I also do not know how a tricked out cake with "ingress dual-dsthost rate 100 overhead 26" would perform in this test (as cake with ingress will not necessarily equalize)
Also they claim they can to set their shaper rate to > 99% of the true bottleneck rate which according to my/our experience seems quite optimistic.
*) I assume standard VDSL2/PTM here but excluded the likely PPPoE Overhead simply becsause I am not 100% sure their ISP uses that
**) Ingress shaping requires to disable the hardware offloading and so the demonstration modem-router had to be rebooted in between the two tests and hence a different sync value
reply other threads:[~2022-10-14 8:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E4B89295-8B80-44AC-93DA-2BE47ED86E6C@gmx.de \
--to=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox