From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-lb0-x22d.google.com (mail-lb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A400921F32F for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by lbbck17 with SMTP id ck17so30090174lbb.1 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:19:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=bQMeDyr6UCQ0mR+rm6OE/RrX40fXXA8mhxK3DWpqtGE=; b=VkHWSWNPsSQT6PkPBm/eQmlYP86JrOm4D3J3ZZc6Q6EtV5bAYIIOJJvb+7CERj8H6J SZiqGXGnNxmUineFQPu8oW5jR5NV8yWynfCI426e9h90LMpMK1T2768PPZiz+EqhejUD MCk50qjWAkQHUPgfRTl3tQcKfdQWl8FEqPFoRkB2VJAm8YX7LcOseI/RvmCBOsdvuRze qj8xM9R+oaXTxVlckIaqLx40ZCmKiSOdli3ZTluy1F+ESSLFzdXqUX+wzYaTfNQFvVkG NRMKbhkYRIhEQKTy2JI+Kv0MYXAXdtF3893DaDbTjzu8bUxKms3oLQsxzxzqIproOVjI 2ngg== X-Received: by 10.112.161.201 with SMTP id xu9mr15762075lbb.10.1444760347825; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bass.home.chromatix.fi (176-93-46-50.bb.dnainternet.fi. [176.93.46.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h7sm709982lbk.8.2015.10.13.11.19.05 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) From: Jonathan Morton In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 21:18:47 +0300 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <5616CE0D.1060309@rogers.com> <561D2CA1.7040705@superduper.net> To: Matt Mathis X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] Another comment re FTC and weather radar from /. X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:19:48 -0000 > On 13 Oct, 2015, at 20:29, Matt Mathis wrote: >=20 > Doppler radar may be wanted everywhere some day. Doppler radar is great, but my understanding is that newer installations = use a different frequency band that doesn=E2=80=99t interfere with the = unlicensed bands. - Jonathan Morton