From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp80.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (smtp80.ord1c.emailsrvr.com [108.166.43.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C81803CB35 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 00:22:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp19.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 83ABDA00B7; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 00:22:42 -0500 (EST) X-SMTPDoctor-Processed: csmtpprox beta Received: from smtp19.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp19.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 801B5A0174; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 00:22:42 -0500 (EST) X-Auth-ID: dev@logicalwebhost.com Received: by smtp19.relay.ord1c.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: dev-AT-logicalwebhost.com) with ESMTPSA id EA06DA00B7; Fri, 4 Jan 2019 00:22:40 -0500 (EST) X-Sender-Id: dev@logicalwebhost.com Received: from [10.8.0.10] (97-90-101-79.static.mdfd.or.charter.com [97.90.101.79]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384) by 0.0.0.0:25 (trex/5.7.12); Fri, 04 Jan 2019 00:22:42 -0500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\)) From: Dev In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 21:22:35 -0800 Cc: bloat Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <9B37BCD5-9ADE-4E7D-8B5C-82830051831B@logicalwebhost.com> <87d0pdy5ik.fsf@toke.dk> To: Pete Heist X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3) Subject: Re: [Bloat] fq_codel on bridge multiple subnets? X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2019 05:22:42 -0000 Okay, so this is what I have for /etc/network/interfaces (replaced = eth0-2 with what Debian Buster actually calls them): auto lo br0 iface lo inet loopback allow-hotplug enp8s0 iface enp8s0 inet static address 192.168.10.200 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.10.1 dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8 iface enp7s6 inet manual tc qdisc add dev enp7s6 root fq_codel iface enp9s2 inet manual tc qdisc add dev enp9s2 root fq_codel # Bridge setup iface br0 inet static bridge_ports enp7s6 enp9s2 #bridge_stp on address 192.168.3.50 broadcast 192.168.3.255 netmask 255.255.255.0 gateway 192.168.3.1 dns-nameservers 8.8.8.8 so my bridge interfaces now show: >: tc -s qdisc show dev enp7s6 qdisc fq_codel 0: root refcnt 2 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 1514 = target 5.0ms interval 100.0ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn Sent 0 bytes 0 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 maxpacket 0 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 0 ecn_mark 0 new_flows_len 0 old_flows_len 0 and=20 >: tc -s qdisc show dev enp9s2 qdisc fq_codel 0: root refcnt 2 limit 10240p flows 1024 quantum 1514 = target 5.0ms interval 100.0ms memory_limit 32Mb ecn Sent 12212 bytes 80 pkt (dropped 0, overlimits 0 requeues 0) backlog 0b 0p requeues 0 maxpacket 0 drop_overlimit 0 new_flow_count 0 ecn_mark 0 new_flows_len 0 old_flows_len 0 with my bridge like: ip a=20 5: br0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state = UP group default qlen 1000 link/ether 00:04:5a:86:a2:84 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.3.50/24 brd 192.168.3.255 scope global br0 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever inet6 fe80::204:5aff:fe86:a284/64 scope link valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever So do I have it configured right or should I change something? I = haven=E2=80=99t gotten a chance to stress test it yet, but will try = tomorrow. - Dev > On Jan 3, 2019, at 10:54 AM, Pete Heist wrote: >=20 >=20 >> On Jan 3, 2019, at 7:12 PM, Toke H=C3=B8iland-J=C3=B8rgensen = wrote: >>=20 >> Dev writes: >>=20 >>> I=E2=80=99m trying to create a bridge on eth1 and eth2, with a = management >>> interface on eth0, then enable fq_codel on the bridge. My bridge >>> interface looks like: >>=20 >> You'll probably want to put FQ-CoDel on the underlying physical >> interfaces, as those are the ones actually queueing the traffic... >=20 > I can confirm that. I'm currently using a bridge on my home router. = eth3 and eth4 are bridged, eth4 is connected to the CPE device which = goes out to the Internet, eth4 is where queue management is applied, and = this works. It does not work to add this to br0=E2=80=A6 >=20