General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] SQM Settings for Bonded DSL?
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 13:14:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <F56B2F89-8709-4DFC-AD4A-60EAA1167981@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <03A702AD-5CC1-42CD-A9BF-783E3183AEF5@gmail.com>

Hi Rich,



> On Jun 21, 2018, at 13:08, Rich Brown <richb.hanover@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi folks,
> 
> Our local DSL ISP (Consolidated Communications, Inc, formerly Fairpoint) recently installed a Smart/RG SR555ac (https://www.smartrg.com/sr555ac) bonded ADSL2 modem.
> 
> I seem to remember earlier messages stating that the dual queues in the DSL modem screwed up (or, de-optimized) the SQM in the router. 

	As far as I can see this should not really cause an issue (besides that latency for single packets will be limited by the fact that you have two half-total-bandwidth links) except maybe that there might be additional overhead for the bonding on the link, but I have never looked at channel bonding so this is pure spekulation. I assume here that your Modem handles the bonding transparently. I could envision that running an non-transparent load-balancer (like with mwan3 under openwrt) might introduce issues for sqm, but if all you see is one ethernet link to the modem I do not expect any major quirks (except latency not being in line with the expectancy from total bandwidth).

> 
> The web GUI does provide info on SNR, sync rates, etc. Any advice for SQM beyond the standard, "measure the no-SQM speed, then start at 5% below..."? Thanks.

	I am curius myself and would like to ask you to keep me/the list posted on whatever you find out about the applicability of sqm to bonding.

Best Regards
	Sebastian


> 
> Rich
> _______________________________________________
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-21 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-21 11:08 Rich Brown
2018-06-21 11:14 ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]
2018-06-21 13:16   ` Jonathan Foulkes
2018-06-21 13:35     ` Sebastian Moeller
2018-06-21 14:09       ` Rich Brown
2018-06-21 11:15 ` Arie
2018-06-21 18:10 ` David Lang
2018-06-22  3:05   ` Rich Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=F56B2F89-8709-4DFC-AD4A-60EAA1167981@gmx.de \
    --to=moeller0@gmx.de \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=richb.hanover@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox