From: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
To: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] DOCSIS cable modems that support PIE?
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 11:16:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <F8FB9BDE-315D-49E0-88EB-4F085865BC77@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADVnQynhT=YiKSenMe9v+-NNOA4zS=KpURq8hn0DNo1Bn3ke0g@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1329 bytes --]
Hi Neal,
As far as I can tell the PIE aqm is mandatory in all DOCSIS 3.1 CPEs, do Al you need is a modem certified for 3.1 and probably also an DOCSIS ISP supplying 3.1 services (I assume the AQM will only be engaged in a docsis 3.1 environment), as in DOCSIS the ISP basically has control over the CPE, so you would need their cooperation. Not every DOCSIS ISP will provision any customer modem, but I assume you have enough leverage to make this happen.
Anyway according to the spec sheets:
AVM Fritzbox 6591
Netgear CM1000-1AZNAS
Arris SB8200
Motorola MB8600
should give you what you want.
Best Reards
Sebastian
P.S.: I would love to hear your results, as information about the effects of docsis pie in the wild is quite limited...
On May 12, 2019 11:24:50 PM GMT+02:00, Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> wrote:
Anyone have a pointer to a cable modem model that is available for purchase and implements the DOCSIS 3.1 PIE mechanism? (So far, my searches for this have only found other people asking this question, rather than the answer. Apologies if I missed something that should be easy to find.)
I'm curious to have one for testing with BBR v2. I'm aware of the Linux PIE implementation, but it would be nice to have the actual cable modem version to play with as well.
Thanks!
neal
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2374 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-13 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-05-12 21:24 Neal Cardwell
2019-05-13 9:16 ` Sebastian Moeller [this message]
2019-05-13 15:13 ` Neal Cardwell
2019-05-13 15:27 ` Sebastian Moeller
2019-05-13 15:48 ` Colin Dearborn
2019-05-15 13:53 ` Neal Cardwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=F8FB9BDE-315D-49E0-88EB-4F085865BC77@gmx.de \
--to=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox