From: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>
To: Matt Mathis <mattmathis@google.com>
Cc: Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>,
bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Credit and/or collaboration on a responsiveness metric?
Date: Tue, 06 Jul 2021 09:28:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YOSEsaaHdBaT3er5@MacBook-Pro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH56bmAnOUO0vX8+2xi1bVWFA37VdDr3XQ6pA9mdT3mcBibSpQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hello Matt,
On 07/05/21 - 16:21, Matt Mathis wrote:
> The rounds based responsiveness metric is awesome! There are several
> slightly different versions, with slightly different properties....
>
> I would like to write a little paper (probably for the IAB workshop), but
> don't want to short change anybody else's credit, or worse, scoop somebody
> else's work in progress. I don't really know if I am retracing
> somebody else's steps, or on a parallel but different path (more likely).
> I would be really sad to publish something and then find out later that I
> trashed some PhD students' thesis....
from our (Apple's) side, you definitely won't be trashing any PhD or master
thesis or anybody's work,...
So, all good from that perspective (it's great of you to ask, as a PhD
student's life ain't easy...) :)
We are going to submit to the IAB workshop at least one paper describing the
Responsiveness/RPM measurement. The goals, methodology,...
I would be happy to collaborate on that. But at the same time it might be
interesting to see the view of the different visions un-changed and then
bring everything together later. So, no strong opinions on whether we should
co-author or not :)
Cheers,
Christoph
>
> *Please let me know if you know of anybody else working in this space, of
> any publications that might be in progress or if people might be interested
> in another collaborator.*
>
> Thanks,
> --MM--
> The best way to predict the future is to create it. - Alan Kay
>
> We must not tolerate intolerance;
> however our response must be carefully measured:
> too strong would be hypocritical and risks spiraling out of
> control;
> too weak risks being mistaken for tacit approval.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-06 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-05 23:21 Matt Mathis
2021-07-06 0:09 ` Dave Taht
2021-07-06 8:48 ` Jonathan Morton
2021-07-06 14:46 ` Michael Richardson
2021-07-07 8:00 ` Sebastian Moeller
2021-07-06 19:04 ` Matt Mathis
2021-07-06 21:56 ` Kathleen Nichols
2021-07-06 16:28 ` Christoph Paasch [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YOSEsaaHdBaT3er5@MacBook-Pro.local \
--to=cpaasch@apple.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=cheshire@apple.com \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=mattmathis@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox