Re: [Bloat] Credit and/or collaboration on a responsiveness metric?

[Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com>]

Hello Matt,

On 07/05/21 - 16:21, Matt Mathis wrote:
> The rounds based responsiveness metric is awesome!   There are several
> slightly different versions, with slightly different properties....
> 
> I would like to write a little paper (probably for the IAB workshop), but
> don't want to short change anybody else's credit, or worse, scoop somebody
> else's work in progress.   I don't really know if I am retracing
> somebody else's steps, or on a parallel but different path (more likely).
>  I would be really sad to publish something and then find out later that I
> trashed some PhD students' thesis....

from our (Apple's) side, you definitely won't be trashing any PhD or master
thesis or anybody's work,...
So, all good from that perspective (it's great of you to ask, as a PhD
student's life ain't easy...) :)

We are going to submit to the IAB workshop at least one paper describing the
Responsiveness/RPM measurement. The goals, methodology,...

I would be happy to collaborate on that. But at the same time it might be
interesting to see the view of the different visions un-changed and then
bring everything together later. So, no strong opinions on whether we should
co-author or not :)


Cheers,
Christoph

> 
> *Please let me know if you know of anybody else working in this space, of
> any publications that might be in progress or if people might be interested
> in another collaborator.*
> 
> Thanks,
> --MM--
> The best way to predict the future is to create it.  - Alan Kay
> 
> We must not tolerate intolerance;
>        however our response must be carefully measured:
>             too strong would be hypocritical and risks spiraling out of
> control;
>             too weak risks being mistaken for tacit approval.