From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <maciej@soltysiak.com>
Received: from mail-40132.protonmail.ch (mail-40132.protonmail.ch
 [185.70.40.132])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2F46F3B2A4;
 Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:08:58 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:08:47 +0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=soltysiak.com;
 s=protonmail; t=1568138936;
 bh=KMStBjw6PY/kMz28SI/9ad4WbOAos+naCmEp6KKGt+g=;
 h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:
 Feedback-ID:From;
 b=ELru2bbReUGgHEbXSHzbVF6FJwIpn/5c/OrNBP215BGbO6t6xWXXMdvlMkdWnMsHx
 xL1zIOq99suoi2Dq58gTa0Tq7yloR+Rn1VEU1DehTUgnJq0j/NSCxZkdIIufMOULsl
 OyjA9ulf+kaAF6iJ2dRvuf8P3GV3+nRJpq7GAc08=
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_So=C5=82tysiak?= <maciej@soltysiak.com>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>,
 cerowrt-devel <cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
 bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Reply-To: =?UTF-8?Q?Maciej_So=C5=82tysiak?= <maciej@soltysiak.com>
Message-ID: <_WFBkuGQ2t1nbWOuKjsSzjHC5Yc60ZcSTKLdJOyJKIRBiHaLkI4uYnZeUOuKuhaq-zLb3ZQ5IuEmBfSjSelCnZOJJ34oJdAN-rl8MXbF-s4=@soltysiak.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5pJgcPGjBtP58UwRq2poY4_ZCj_DxgqtcqJFK1BSfX1w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAA93jw5OS9zxQasFFn6C2354yvyFO0xin+O6jYFrx46Ax5Tx=g@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1909031420320.21548@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <CAA93jw6VxZ4V85qYHWzb1UsLUX6acUu=1oXT6fWVpqnzAWgQUw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw5pJgcPGjBtP58UwRq2poY4_ZCj_DxgqtcqJFK1BSfX1w@mail.gmail.com>
Feedback-ID: BgGZWNpQ72vxpb-bOaC_p2RD0qvvfcZ_T0IqNMUSaeON2PXyOvZelvE-Ssn070-B4tVEp5CwLkAiLupAHKEVcA==:Ext:ProtonMail
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=7.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED,
 DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF autolearn=ham
 autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on mail.protonmail.ch
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Cerowrt-devel] Revising the synflood limit
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:08:58 -0000

> OK, I started a topic over there. It would be good to know how many
> other firewall tools set a syn limit by default, but that would take
> way more research.
>
> https://forum.openwrt.org/t/the-synflood-limit-is-too-low-for-the-modern-=
internet/43957
Nice catch! I've 10 to 15 devices on my network. Just in 24h I see I had 10=
k SYN's rejected!