* [Bloat] bufferbloat on 10Gig fiber at the gathering?
@ 2013-03-27 17:20 Dave Taht
2013-03-28 1:04 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Dave Taht @ 2013-03-27 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bloat
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1435 bytes --]
see a rrul test on this link at - (sorry you will have to unmangle the
url, no dns for this yet)
http:// 151 dot 216 dot 125 dot 10/germany/rrul/long_period_swings.svg
I am curious if this is an artifact of the data, the rrul test itself,
or actually observing long period latency swings due to bufferbloat at
these enormous speeds.
Similarly, I did a long period test to my machine in california:
http:// 151 dot 216 dot 125 dot 10 /~d/california/postfixes_long.svg
The measured latency on this link, unloaded, was 195ms, earlier this
morning before 5000 participants arrived
http:// 151 dot 216 dot 125 dot 10 /~d/rrul/to_california2.svg
so there appears to be ~15ms of intrinsic latency added, and then
anywhere between 10-200ms more, at the bottleneck fiber link to the
internet from "the gathering", too.
plenty of other data on the same ~d url, I figure the above format
will pass your spam stoppers.
There is no RED nor WRR configured on this cisco box, and although it
appears both are supported on the 10gig line card, I have no idea how
to configure RED at these speeds (3 10gig fiber lines, 2 of which are
basically saturated so far). Suggestions?
Very interesting data thus far. I am getting tons of captures. It is a
really impressive scene, see my g+ account for some pictures.
--
Dave Täht
Fixing bufferbloat with cerowrt: http://www.teklibre.com/cerowrt/subscribe.html
[-- Attachment #2: bloaton10gigfiber.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 254508 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] bufferbloat on 10Gig fiber at the gathering?
2013-03-27 17:20 [Bloat] bufferbloat on 10Gig fiber at the gathering? Dave Taht
@ 2013-03-28 1:04 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-03-28 7:57 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Abrahamsson @ 2013-03-28 1:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht; +Cc: bloat
On Wed, 27 Mar 2013, Dave Taht wrote:
> There is no RED nor WRR configured on this cisco box, and although it
> appears both are supported on the 10gig line card, I have no idea how to
> configure RED at these speeds (3 10gig fiber lines, 2 of which are
> basically saturated so far). Suggestions?
What platform is used? ASR9000? It has ~50 ms of FIFO buffering per port
if nothing is configured if I remember correctly.
policy-map EGRESS
class class-default
random-detect precedence 0 10 ms 30 ms
int teng0/0/0/0
service-policy EGRESS output
This should create a policy-map called EGRESS which does WRED for prec 0
traffic with 0% drop until 10 ms and 100% drop at 30ms of buffer depth,
and then this is attached in the egress-direction on tengi0/0/0/0
> Very interesting data thus far. I am getting tons of captures. It is a
> really impressive scene, see my g+ account for some pictures.
I'm kind of disappointed that they don't have enough bw there, lately
these kinds of events have had more bandwidth available than has been
used because ISPs and vendors have used them as tech demonstrators, and
also that people have enough bw available at home so it's been less
downloading/uploading done there.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bloat] bufferbloat on 10Gig fiber at the gathering?
2013-03-28 1:04 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
@ 2013-03-28 7:57 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Abrahamsson @ 2013-03-28 7:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Taht; +Cc: bloat
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> What platform is used? ASR9000? It has ~50 ms of FIFO buffering per port if
> nothing is configured if I remember correctly.
According to <http://technet.gathering.org/page/2/> it's 6500 so my guess
is that the buffering you're seeing isn't within the LAN but instead
within the ISP network, because the 6500 linecards don't really have that
much buffer space.
> policy-map EGRESS
> class class-default
> random-detect precedence 0 10 ms 30 ms
>
> int teng0/0/0/0
> service-policy EGRESS output
This won't work on Cisco 6500.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-28 7:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-27 17:20 [Bloat] bufferbloat on 10Gig fiber at the gathering? Dave Taht
2013-03-28 1:04 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2013-03-28 7:57 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox