From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA6EC21F19F
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 00:57:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 010BF9C; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 08:57:48 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5BF79A;
	Thu, 28 Mar 2013 08:57:48 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 08:57:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1303280153440.11255@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1303280856280.11255@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CAA93jw4wZQ9-m=BTvi3gJCZT5VNVN_803q-pXg6WLR9efVd7SQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1303280153440.11255@uplift.swm.pp.se>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] bufferbloat on 10Gig fiber at the gathering?
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 07:57:52 -0000

On Thu, 28 Mar 2013, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:

> What platform is used? ASR9000? It has ~50 ms of FIFO buffering per port if 
> nothing is configured if I remember correctly.

According to <http://technet.gathering.org/page/2/> it's 6500 so my guess 
is that the buffering you're seeing isn't within the LAN but instead 
within the ISP network, because the 6500 linecards don't really have that 
much buffer space.

> policy-map EGRESS
> class class-default
> random-detect precedence 0 10 ms 30 ms
>
> int teng0/0/0/0
> service-policy EGRESS output

This won't work on Cisco 6500.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se