From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 016DF21F1E1 for ; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 09:41:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4B97D9C; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 17:41:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE9059A; Sat, 2 Nov 2013 17:41:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 17:41:49 +0100 (CET) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Aaron Wood In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20131030162534.29f34ada@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <5271BAA7.2080905@kau.se> <20131031023257.GB3365@lists.bufferbloat.net> <52724CA9.4020606@kau.se> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] mobile broadband buffer bloat X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Nov 2013 16:41:53 -0000 On Fri, 1 Nov 2013, Aaron Wood wrote: > I find the notion of LTE that's faster than DSL somewhat amazing, still. Yes, LTE is really fast when the operator has 20MHz to play with. The difference from DSL however is that the cell is shared, so it varies a lot more in speed compared to DSL (at least in the places where the DSL providers aren't congesting their uplinks at peak hour). -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se