From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65EFE21F300 for ; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:58:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id s7L6w7Iv015504; Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:58:07 -0700 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2014 23:58:07 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" In-Reply-To: <20140820083056.GA6559@sesse.net> Message-ID: References: <20140820083056.GA6559@sesse.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] sigcomm wifi X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 06:58:12 -0000 On Wed, 20 Aug 2014, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:45:21AM -0500, Dave Taht wrote: >> I figured y'all would be bemused by the wifi performance in the sigcomm >> main conference room this morning... >> >> http://snapon.lab.bufferbloat.net/~d/sigcomm_tuesday.png > > High-density 802.11 is hard. Doesn't have to be bloat, though. =) yep, hard but not impossible (even with WNDR3800 routers) you have to work hard to get the RF side as clean as it can get. David Lang