From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 896B921F1A1 for ; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:49:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id s7LJn2jt019082; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:49:02 -0700 Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 12:49:02 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer In-Reply-To: <20140821114616.36c0142f@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <91696A3A-EF44-4A1A-8070-D3AF25D0D9AC@netapp.com> <20140821114616.36c0142f@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] sigcomm wifi X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 19:49:04 -0000 On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:04:54 -0700 (PDT) David Lang wrote: > >> here's a paper I did a couple years ago on the network we build for Scale '11 >> >> https://www.usenix.org/conference/lisa12/technical-sessions/presentation/lang_david_wireless > > Thank you, David! Just finished watching this, very excellent > presentation. Good with some information sharing based on practical > wifi deployments. > > I also find this/your presentation interesting: > http://talks.lang.hm/talks/topics/Wireless/Cascadia_2012/Wireless.pdf > Where you go more into the channels. > > Thanks for all the good work :-) the difference between 20 min of time and an hour of time (there should also be a video on my lang.hm site, but it's a slow uplink) One trick we pulled this year at Scale that I think made a big difference is that we labled the 2.4 GHz network "Scale-slow" and the 5GHz network "Scale", this seems to have pushed a LOT more people to using the less congested 5GHz band. David Lang