From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2290721F2CF for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 06:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 01C5BA4; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:00:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1411650031; bh=CV6T90iPtHFfFnNOZTjEpRUtKqBItFCw5CBFiNqGTgs=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=31bZI+2x2p5UaH9e/lMvap35ei4n64Vtd9nMRibql6kmenfG+8SbQnebaNodSg9vf iEOUXMKmmZwjroFA4eY3qH9IivX1RGHG1gSYyGV07yS4R2BJ/ZPAqeC8YmzqYrw1nv fEOdJ108D4lA4tbQEVQiUZLiRduVbKKAHTyoV04Y= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC20AA3; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:00:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 15:00:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: David Lang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: bloat Subject: Re: [Bloat] I feel an urge to update this X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 13:01:02 -0000 On Thu, 25 Sep 2014, David Lang wrote: > What is the problem with making this assumption? Why should we try to > change every device on the Internet to provide this information instead > of just using this as the default? Read the email that started this thread. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se