From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC83F21F24D
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 06:18:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 7D932A3; Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:18:44 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
	t=1424960324; bh=XmCjZPBtv4FBnViajnNVMEEGC3sFuDY/UnTb1KGJP1U=;
	h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=FvJnVj2xvyFB4MbAqzytla4HqvYTH3ympBrDJhMvgUYl6BE8g9nmY+4O4/diSE61F
	wahb6izaKACbMkvS3l4t5aVnUmtZUHoUHA8yMhC/hLVhOsgDAaf0V/qixc+wsLgzwD
	IZv25vjAGwOsj6MbMaLbkyKct7oTaZURut5d0e9w=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7242EA2;
	Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:18:44 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:18:44 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN <luca.muscariello@orange.com>
In-Reply-To: <54EF2877.8030302@orange.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1502261517230.4007@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CADnS-2hPmb3zt6GvdbZjDuM10VgN5yvMrxigUL5Z_-nA-dOyjw@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1502250737150.4007@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<201502250806.t1P86o5N011632@bagheera.jungle.bt.co.uk>
	<mck1t7$ies$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<FC82EEB0-5E7E-473F-B9B3-2BFEC06C7689@ifi.uio.no>
	<4A80D1F9-F4A1-4D14-AC75-958C5A2E8168@gmx.de>
	<3F47B274-B0E4-44F2-A434-E3C9F7D5D041@ifi.uio.no>
	<87twyaffv3.fsf@toke.dk>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1502251138490.4007@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<1D438EDC-358D-4DD5-9B8D-89182256F66C@gmx.de>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1502251433230.4007@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<54EDD951.50904@orange.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1502251659430.4007@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<54EE07C0.60703@orange.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1502261353500.4007@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<54EF2877.8030302@orange.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: "bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net" <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] RED against bufferbloat
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 14:19:16 -0000

On Thu, 26 Feb 2015, MUSCARIELLO Luca IMT/OLN wrote:

> Done with the vendor itself with related NDA etc. It takes longer to set 
> the agreement than coding the system. The problem is that this process 
> is not ok. An ISP cannot maintain someone else product if it is closed.

Do you have a requirement document that makes sense to the people 
programming these ASICs for vendors? When I try to explain what needs to 
be done I usually run into very frustrating discussions.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se