From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7652721F509 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 03:45:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id t3JAj65E007756; Sun, 19 Apr 2015 03:45:06 -0700 Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 03:45:06 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: jb In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] DSLReports Speed Test has latency measurement built-in X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2015 10:45:38 -0000 On Sun, 19 Apr 2015, jb wrote: > Hey there is nothing wrong with Megapath ! they were my second ISP after > Northpoint went bust. > If I had a time machine, and went back to 2001, I'd be very happy with > Megapath.. :) nothing's wrong with megapath, just with the phone lines in the area limiting the best speed I can get. In any case, this looks like a good test. David Lang