From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <david@lang.hm>
Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B65721F332
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:45:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100])
	by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
	t3KFjcIk013943; Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:45:38 -0700
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 08:45:38 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm
To: sahil grover <sahilgrover013@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CADnS-2j_UbD7OGYPWe2j010NgMKuyCpG8taL4qkhu3TcDdGxNA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1504200842080.12399@nftneq.ynat.uz>
References: <CADnS-2h5PTESZzn2kdGcmGyxL-d0XU9RpramA7AO0X8sNj22xg@mail.gmail.com>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1504181318530.26044@nftneq.ynat.uz>
	<CADnS-2j_UbD7OGYPWe2j010NgMKuyCpG8taL4qkhu3TcDdGxNA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/Plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Realtime Response Under Load (RRUL) Test
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2015 15:46:09 -0000

On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, sahil grover wrote:

> David Sir,
>
> Thanks for answering.
>
> can you please tell me how to interpret its output?
>
> By   "netperf-wrapper rrul netperf.bufferbloat.net" ( i chose netserver
> that is running on netperf.bufferbloat.net)
> output(result.png) is attached.
>
> please tell me first what does it say generally?
> secondly,  anything related with bufferbloat point of view.

latency should not increase significantly under load. The fact that it does 
indicates that you have a problem. The fact that the latency can increase to 
multi-second values for many people indicates a big problem.

take a look at the new test that's available at 
https://www.dslreports.com/speedtest and then look at the results tab and see 
how the latency increases during the download and upload tests.

If you have a system without excessive buffering, you would not see massive 
increases in latency.

Contact me off-list if you want a deeper discussion of the history of 
bufferbloat and what's going on to try and solve it.

David Lang