From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D12821F324
	for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 11:04:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
	id 2DFF3A1; Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:04:35 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
	t=1429812275; bh=L5mWtL/TunHCGulmg/5iYcamlnH+TXx8EXTJTxFXwzw=;
	h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=keAOqSQOIjYSjM6gS5s1eFAj3Uk8ndBGfV0elJMbwDkShWZVKFfixFptXafmh2hDX
	1gFI7oK8JJHUr20/cZSELpHA189PpwAC3q3XPHVz11BUQWul0jgxKO0wzPfMkJgj/+
	3TfKf0XnCF/Yy8g24P3csqYnupnYkwQlbcFiUkCw=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 267B29F;
	Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:04:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 20:04:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw5FmqfEVUDM5Dvk17twpBA_DD3v9jB1pHngA2JAjdfrMw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1504232000400.16871@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CAH3Ss97dy6wDSoPeyhZkEgDBvZc+7cduV5tTRmQ5uKkiK5V0qg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87wq18jmak.fsf@toke.dk>
	<CAH3Ss96VC5PP74F4_gsfgJeB0tmpZV+DsWcZEhVFL5U5m5OG2g@mail.gmail.com>
	<87oamkjfhf.fsf@toke.dk> <87k2x8jcnw.fsf@toke.dk>
	<alpine.DEB.2.02.1504191913490.16871@uplift.swm.pp.se>
	<CAA93jw6J=Ks7+UB8QniH0N2fYQ_M4Dm6QVgOwFW4vKUBrAjTmw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw57k7q26p7eUmKLh+8RcMhGU+iK6HNtkh3xizo4iaou7g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAA93jw5FmqfEVUDM5Dvk17twpBA_DD3v9jB1pHngA2JAjdfrMw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] DSLReports Speed Test has latency measurement built-in
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
	<mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 18:05:07 -0000

On Thu, 23 Apr 2015, Dave Taht wrote:

> justin:
>
> thx for nuking the log scale. that makes the bloat much more visible
> here (typical cablemodem)
>
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/322800
>
> I am puzzled as to my post fq_codel result here at T+40 and will have
> to repeat...
>
> http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/322992

This is my DOCSIS3 250/50 connection:

http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/349547

During the evenings (as it was when I tested now) I seem to not get over 
100-150 megabit/s downstream, indicating it's saturating on the coax 
segment at peak usage. I should probably get a newer modem, mine is a few 
years old.

It's actually remarkably un-bloated...

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se