From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A49021F16D for ; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 08:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id t3QFZN68017687; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 08:35:23 -0700 Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 08:35:22 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: "Steinar H. Gunderson" In-Reply-To: <20150426142336.GA24211@sesse.net> Message-ID: References: <553B2863.2020600@gmail.com> <553BA193.1030907@gmail.com> <553C84FE.5070101@gmail.com> <20150426142336.GA24211@sesse.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Subject: Re: [Bloat] Adblock - or another extension - is incorrectly blocking the speed test X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:58:47 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:58:47 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:58:47 -0000 On Sun, 26 Apr 2015, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:00:31AM +1000, jb wrote: >> No, I'm not going to do that. I absolutely hate even _considering_ changing >> how I want to do something for an extension that doesn't know the difference >> between an IP address and a script. > > What about if the user is behind NAT64? IP literals won't work at all in that > case. If you can't get to IPv4 addresses, then you won't be able to get to the addresses returned by DNS either. David Lang