From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: jb <justin@dslr.net>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] extremely good dslreports result for bufferbloat on free.fr
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2015 16:44:57 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1504281640350.28505@nftneq.ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAH3Ss94djrT2PUHSkB5yJbPc4ON6HLX2YTiRkXmVCmyP3D+PWA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/Plain, Size: 2101 bytes --]
On Wed, 29 Apr 2015, jb wrote:
> If the tool were to list ISPs in descending order of a bloaty factor from
> best (like this
> one) http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/375736
> to worst (like I don't know yet), what would be the ranking factor?
I think the biggest problem is differentiating between bloat on the ISP side and
bloat on the endpoint router. A given ISP may have very good internal setups,
but bad/obsolete equipment at the endpoints, or the endpoints could be upgraded
and the ISP could still have problems on their side.
> Call B the "blue" series of latencies.
> Call G the "idle" series
> Call O the "orange" series
>
> What is fn1(fn2(B),fn2(G),fn2(O)) that generates an open-ended bloat
> factor, where 0 is no problem ?
> What is fn1() that takes a series of latencies and produces one latency?
> What is fn1() that takes three latencies, and produces a bloat factor?
>
> And then having obtained a "bloat factor" for one result, do you combine
> them using an average?
>
> Also should there be another input such as connection speed.
> Should higher speed lines be held to a higher standard?
if you measure the bloat as the difference from idle, then using one standard
for all speeds should be reasonable.
> The "bloat factor" can be what is reported next to Ping on a test result.
> Should it be an infinite set of numbers from 0 .. infinity or should it be
> a grade
> A+ down to F ?
> (a grade would be more user-friendly).
I think A+ down to F is good. based on our jitter discussion,
A+ <5ms
A <30ms
B <60ms
C <200ms
D <400ms
F >400ms
or something like this (so that not all situations result in A+ or F)
David Lang
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/107942175615993706558/posts/ZytYb4ZkMdY
>>
>> --
>> Dave Täht
>> Open Networking needs **Open Source Hardware**
>>
>> https://plus.google.com/u/0/+EricRaymond/posts/JqxCe2pFr67
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bloat mailing list
>> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
>>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 140 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-28 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-28 14:48 Dave Taht
2015-04-28 23:33 ` jb
2015-04-28 23:44 ` David Lang [this message]
2015-04-29 1:39 ` Jonathan Morton
2015-04-29 2:01 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-29 2:49 ` jb
2015-04-29 16:32 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2015-04-29 18:32 ` Dave Taht
[not found] ` <CAH3Ss96FnwgK8qxdV-n46GLe2FSsRRa7zD1M_Wmq91o=+-7qdQ@mail.gmail.com>
2015-04-30 4:23 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-30 4:33 ` jb
2015-04-30 4:43 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-30 4:55 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-30 5:23 ` Dave Taht
2015-04-30 5:49 ` jb
2015-04-30 16:36 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-01 0:48 ` Rich Brown
2015-05-01 3:10 ` jb
2015-05-01 4:41 ` [Bloat] ThinkBroadBand also has a bloat detector in their speed test Rich Brown
2015-05-01 6:17 ` jb
2015-05-01 6:05 ` [Bloat] extremely good dslreports result for bufferbloat on free.fr Dave Taht
2015-05-01 6:31 ` jb
2015-05-01 8:10 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-02 11:49 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-02 13:40 ` jb
2015-05-02 15:01 ` Sebastian Moeller
2015-05-02 16:55 ` Dave Taht
2015-05-02 17:15 ` Aaron Wood
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1504281640350.28505@nftneq.ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=justin@dslr.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox