From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (mail.lang.hm [64.81.33.126]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by huchra.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3646021FB25 for ; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id t6T7Jg5X002324; Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:19:42 -0700 Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 00:19:42 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Simon Barber In-Reply-To: <14ed5013130.27f7.e972a4f4d859b00521b2b659602cb2f9@superduper.net> Message-ID: References: <87a8ugqvid.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <87r3nstnj5.fsf@toke.dk> <876154qtkt.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <87mvygtm1a.fsf@toke.dk> <14ed5013130.27f7.e972a4f4d859b00521b2b659602cb2f9@superduper.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="680960-1259154188-1438154382=:1813" Cc: bloat , Juliusz Chroboczek Subject: Re: [Bloat] AQM and PPP on Linux X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:20:12 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --680960-1259154188-1438154382=:1813 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT If you have high RTT on loopback or virtual interfaces, Codel is going to be the least of your problems ;-) David Lang On Tue, 28 Jul 2015, Simon Barber wrote: > The main danger is the negative effects on performance of using Codel. You > may experience low throughput on high RTT links. > > Simon > > Sent with AquaMail for Android > http://www.aqua-mail.com > > > On July 28, 2015 7:06:22 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > >> Juliusz Chroboczek writes: >> >> >> What distro are you on? >> > >> > Debian. (One machine stable, one testing.) >> >> Right. Don't know if there's already an effort to convince the Debian >> devs to switch the default... >> >> >> Set this to fq_codel and you should be good to go. >> > >> > Is that safe? I'm thinking lo and virtual interfaces. >> >> Why wouldn't it be? The lo interface doesn't have a queue at all AFAIK. >> And if you have congestion at your virtual interfaces wouldn't you want >> it de-bloated? :) >> >> -Toke >> _______________________________________________ >> Bloat mailing list >> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net >> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > > > _______________________________________________ > Bloat mailing list > Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net > https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat > --680960-1259154188-1438154382=:1813--