From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@gmail.com>
Cc: bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Speed tests - attribution of latency to relevant network hops
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 14:28:00 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507291426410.16775@nftneq.ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55B92BF3.2000607@gmail.com>
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> Now that dslreports has set the benchmark on combining speed testing
> with latency measurements I was thinking about what the next steps could
> be. Here's what I came up with:
>
> Would it be useful to try and attribute the latency to certain relevant
> network hops, like so:
>
> First hop: round-trip latency of the link connecting the user's machine
> to their local network. This could be wifi or Ethernet in a home or
> office environment; it could be wifi or cellular in a public
> environment, etc.
>
> Local network: round-trip latency to the first upstream port that has a
> public IP address. Of course this is only useful if the user's machine
> doesn't already have a routable IP address.
>
> ISP: round-trip latency to the second upstream port that has a public IP
> address. So this would be the DSLAM/BRAS/CMTS or whatever access
> concentrator the ISP uses.
>
> This would probably need to be based on ping. Which IP addresses to ping
> would initially need to be found out through traceroute-like methods.
>
> If we can then get users to tell us not only what Internet access
> technology they use (i.e. cable, DSL, GPON etc) but also what local
> access technology (i.e. wifi, Ethernet etc) we'd know how to attribute
> the above numbers to technologies.
unless you measure it per hop, how are you going to attribute it to each hop?
and unless you have a server at that layer to talk to, how do you know what the
latency or bandwidth is?
David Lang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-29 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-29 19:39 Jan Ceuleers
2015-07-29 21:28 ` David Lang [this message]
2015-07-30 4:52 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2015-07-30 5:17 ` Jan Ceuleers
2015-07-30 13:04 ` Bill Ver Steeg (versteb)
2015-07-30 14:54 ` Jan Ceuleers
2015-07-30 15:27 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1507291426410.16775@nftneq.ynat.uz \
--to=david@lang.hm \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=jan.ceuleers@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox