From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bifrost.lang.hm (lang.hm [66.167.227.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 566593B4D2 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 20:40:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (asgard.lang.hm [10.0.0.100]) by bifrost.lang.hm (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id u3F0ePId021990 for ; Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:40:30 -0700 Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2016 17:40:25 -0700 (PDT) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [Bloat] bloat in linux disk I/O stack X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 00:40:33 -0000 This lwn.net article about writeback problems correctly draws parallels with networking and bufferbloat https://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/682582/96676d064f4bce65/ Toward less-annoying background writeback David Lang