General list for discussing Bufferbloat
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Lang <david@lang.hm>
To: Kathleen Nichols <nichols@pollere.com>
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Open Source Speed Test (was fast.com - Netflix's speed monitoring)
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:20:31 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1608261619030.18129@nftneq.ynat.uz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <90667e99-1334-af36-5879-3b4ed362ed68@pollere.com>

On Fri, 26 Aug 2016, Kathleen Nichols wrote:

> I think it might be useful to say these tests measure the maximum
> *potential* for
> bufferbloat. That is, they plumb the depths of the buffers in the path.
> I tried running
> dslreports while I was running a video and though dslreports ramps
> delays up to 700ms,
> before and after that peak delay is more like 45ms. I don't think large
> buffers are going
> to go away, what matters is whether they are getting filled up.
>
> So, is "bufferbloat" the existence of large buffers or the existence of
> large queues? I think
> the latter.

large buffers that never fill up may as well be small buffers.

it's the fact that the large buffers fill that's the problem.

so you can call it large queues instead of large buffers, but the result is that 
packets end up being 'in transit' for a long time.

David Lang

  reply	other threads:[~2016-08-26 23:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-23 18:42 Livingood, Jason
2016-08-24 16:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-08-24 17:28   ` Livingood, Jason
2016-08-26 23:13     ` Kathleen Nichols
2016-08-26 23:20       ` David Lang [this message]
2016-08-26 23:37         ` Kathleen Nichols
2016-08-27  1:06           ` David Lang
2016-08-27  5:02             ` grenville armitage
2016-08-27 12:16             ` Jonathan Morton
2016-08-27  0:20       ` Benjamin Cronce

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1608261619030.18129@nftneq.ynat.uz \
    --to=david@lang.hm \
    --cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
    --cc=nichols@pollere.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox