From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Jan Ceuleers <jan.ceuleers@gmail.com>
Cc: Benjamin Cronce <bcronce@gmail.com>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
Subject: Re: [Bloat] 22 seconds til bloat on gfiber?
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 17:36:57 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1610261733530.12036@uplift.swm.pp.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <77a4abf0-bc94-0d2e-eebe-d72e2e676255@gmail.com>
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Jan Ceuleers wrote:
> What I mean is that the OLT optics become very expensive if you need to
> support as many lambdas as you have customers. You'd furthermore need an
> OLT port for much fewer customers (e.g. 1 port per 64 or 128 customers)
> than the thousands you can support on a (shared) GPON port on a single
> lambda.
That only works if your customers don't use their Internet access very
much. If they do, you're in trouble and have to rebuild.
In my market, we're now in the access speeds where 100/10 is on the lower
end of access, and it's not uncommon for people to have 250, 500 or 1000
downstream. If they then actually start using their bw then you'd have to
rebuild to either go higher speed for some CPE (complicated and
expensive), or rebuild to have smaller splitter domains.
I guess the answer depends a lot on your cost of labour.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-26 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-22 21:56 Dave Taht
2016-10-22 23:52 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-10-23 1:33 ` jb
2016-10-23 1:45 ` Dave Taht
2016-10-23 1:47 ` Dave Taht
2016-10-23 2:27 ` jb
[not found] ` <CAJq5cE3DsV9v6ATVeq+vF_kVFjKy+8Qjwe-P01ZZbyKZB9HC6w@mail.gmail.com>
2016-10-23 8:29 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-10-23 9:23 ` jb
2016-10-23 16:14 ` Klatsky, Carl
2016-10-24 0:46 ` jb
2016-10-24 13:13 ` Klatsky, Carl
2016-10-24 16:11 ` Noah Causin
2016-10-24 20:27 ` Klatsky, Carl
2016-10-23 2:30 ` Benjamin Cronce
2016-10-25 7:10 ` Jonas Mårtensson
2016-10-23 5:50 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-10-24 16:57 ` Jonas Mårtensson
2016-10-24 22:10 ` Benjamin Cronce
2016-10-25 0:09 ` jb
2016-10-25 12:01 ` Benjamin Cronce
2016-10-25 13:11 ` Klatsky, Carl
2016-10-25 21:20 ` jb
2016-10-26 0:02 ` Klatsky, Carl
2016-10-25 15:59 ` Jan Ceuleers
2016-10-26 1:05 ` Benjamin Cronce
2016-10-26 14:49 ` Jan Ceuleers
2016-10-26 15:36 ` Mikael Abrahamsson [this message]
2016-10-27 14:32 ` Jonas Mårtensson
2016-10-27 16:56 ` Dave Taht
2016-10-27 17:56 ` [Bloat] Sidebar on s-curves David Collier-Brown
2016-10-27 19:30 ` [Bloat] 22 seconds til bloat on gfiber? David Lang
2016-10-27 19:41 ` Dave Taht
2016-10-27 19:48 ` Aaron Wood
2016-10-28 15:51 ` Jan Ceuleers
2016-10-28 15:55 ` Klatsky, Carl
2016-10-27 19:45 ` Aaron Wood
2016-10-27 20:17 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2016-12-07 5:40 ` Jonathan Morton
2016-12-07 7:05 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
[not found] <mailman.313.1477591111.3555.bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
2016-10-27 19:27 ` Jonathan Foulkes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.02.1610261733530.12036@uplift.swm.pp.se \
--to=swmike@swm.pp.se \
--cc=bcronce@gmail.com \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=jan.ceuleers@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox