From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.lang.hm (h-66-167-227-145.lsan.ca.dynamic.globalcapacity.com [66.167.227.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF76E3CB3A for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 20:56:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from asgard.lang.hm (syslog [10.0.0.100]) by mail.lang.hm (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE88B3FB66; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 17:56:17 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:56:10 -0800 (PST) From: David Lang X-X-Sender: dlang@asgard.lang.hm To: Mikael Abrahamsson cc: Dave Taht , bloat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Bloat] one benefit of turning off shaping + fq_codel X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 01:56:19 -0000 On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > On Tue, 13 Nov 2018, Dave Taht wrote: > >> It turns out we are contributing to global warming. >> >> > https://community.ubnt.com/t5/UniFi-Routing-Switching/USG-temperature/m-p/2547046/highlight/true#M115060 so how much power is wasted in re-transmitting packets due to bloat?