From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32AE63B2A4 for ; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 02:20:33 -0500 (EST) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9B14AB2; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:20:31 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1511594431; bh=zKEV5Ez8d2srMZEv2eFGZJadM0dVe16dEvg4SvNFPTE=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Ecil03h7Jdk5lG9RH0oOpezx/JOmMIgLYfkoagFzJzwtcROngpfA0/2bh+k4GcFAh nG4p3nkLU5Z0OpfX3yjZ1S/YOY80NsbkGtWxLcK6vjg1OY+GTu2Kpn39ylvRkklEwY kZaNC7nUTZK70HeOOt3ou4yJG3Kw81/kA3uPpYTs= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82775B1; Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:20:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 08:20:31 +0100 (CET) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Dave Taht cc: bloat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Bloat] keyboard bloat X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 07:20:33 -0000 On Fri, 24 Nov 2017, Dave Taht wrote: > https://danluu.com/keyboard-latency/ This is very interesting. This guy is doing "button to pixel" delay testing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4GnKsqDAmgY At 2:25 he's also talking about the total chain of events that needs to happen between input and when you see something on the screen. I wish there was more focus and testing on these kinds of things, then perhaps we'd also get more focus on bufferbloat in the network. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se