From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E58343CB3D for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 09:04:27 -0500 (EST) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 67AB9B1; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:04:26 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1518617066; bh=Jf5vymHdbu3+7NC3Qg25GukbQ280695FF9zA2nhLy84=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KXIT655mKVNqmh97nmMOzVakfwskgMJkLdp8eFVaTNvsC4BAddv9o4CrwdTeLxLUz jG9BQPrC9AQbUsTOOpgyihMrbpBOXCrd9ZHHKakrmQ07p+maO5oFoLDQGG+fBeH83a fXXQ2gBNhq65tD0PSPGISldXm+nHOEbb3aKqpkZ8= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654A6B0; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:04:26 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 15:04:26 +0100 (CET) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Dave Taht cc: Jim Gettys , bloat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Bloat] The Blind Men and the Elephant. X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:04:28 -0000 On Mon, 12 Feb 2018, Dave Taht wrote: > but to me the simpler thing would be to garner folk to ask at > vendor/isp press conferences: "Have you implemented RFC8290 yet? If > not, when?" Has anyone implemented FQ_CODEL in a packet accelerator, or is this still a CPU thing only? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se