From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB88F3B29E; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:51:44 -0400 (EDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id E4B77B1; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:51:42 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1535021502; bh=Kof9lMEfOC6Rtitix5n2C2XMs0XLhhL3D/rq89NFUEo=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pIIbdBkbNP8UrNSwHBUr9ghBT3wB34qVdJART/vxq4y4ZkTrj6MSPgzuRfsTY7eNw vnGgDSnbThNe/ZsA6Fc5eoOsuB1dJMGvagXOL6QVRA6jDlkhZgDkCpC6JNTv7kK6aK sruRFZ+SprWH9El2+N8ldAOipXlI/SRlkwLWdzBM= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25C3AF; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:51:42 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 12:51:42 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Pete Heist cc: Dave Taht , cerowrt-devel@lists.bufferbloat.net, bloat In-Reply-To: <999D19F8-7E27-47CB-BC14-06193CC40943@heistp.net> Message-ID: References: <999D19F8-7E27-47CB-BC14-06193CC40943@heistp.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; BOUNDARY="-137064504-864735299-1535021502=:23215" Subject: Re: [Bloat] beating the drum for BQL X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 10:51:44 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. ---137064504-864735299-1535021502=:23215 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 23 Aug 2018, Pete Heist wrote: > >> On Aug 23, 2018, at 2:49 AM, Dave Taht wrote: >> >> I had a chance to give a talk at broadcom recently, slides here: >> >> http://flent-fremont.bufferbloat.net/~d/broadcom_aug9.pdf > > Thanks for sharing, this is really useful, raising awareness where it matters. Quite a bit of content... :) > > Ubiquiti needs some work getting this into more of their products (EdgeMAX in particular). A good time to lobby for this might be, well a couple months ago, as they’re producing alpha builds for their upcoming 2.0 release with kernel 4.9 and new Cavium/Mediatek/Octeon SDKs. I just asked about the status in the EdgeRouter Beta forum, in case it finds the right eyes before the release: > > https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter-Beta/BQL-support/m-p/2466657 > > https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Beta-Blog/New-EdgeRouter-firmware-2-0-0-alpha-2-has-been-released/ba-p/2414938 My only experience with these devices is the Edgerouter 3/5/X, and they have very low performance if you disable offloads (which you need to do to enable AQM) and run everything in CPU, around 100 megabit/s of uni-directional traffic. Do they have other platforms where this would actually matter? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se ---137064504-864735299-1535021502=:23215--