From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E20B93CB35
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 07:33:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
 id 496B0AF; Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:33:08 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
 t=1535369588; bh=TNgJv8fzRQFzy3pEBndrisJ+EE4YpcRQ7yqKRqamzNo=;
 h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=0Iw2hwgHYzbFjpL+qpkW6/tRoHL3eZs20BOstaRcZ2h57APZ18PbUy9ttD0ZtyZNz
 A3L84ErdkpL6WsS+1ivlYB7vCMx1ka0mTWA0+ITkXDby+rksD9CdKnYcZCrZF7Xa7L
 3zOkwo2+I6kZ6mSYRqRxZGr4rsNAuoso3Kdx2wbg=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45B8E9F;
 Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:33:08 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:33:08 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
cc: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>, bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAA93jw6J_5EATBJb6ZZ71AL=rga9gLcsK=08jdMuMZRsD1Ae-g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1808271332110.23215@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <CAA93jw7_FUA=LYdPFoy4TE5pbYJFuWb6fMreJFRUPK4xLBA76A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1808230746320.19688@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <F508D2DC-474B-4E90-BDEC-97874A4E9194@gmx.de>
 <66e2374b-f998-b132-410e-46c9089bb06b@gmail.com>
 <360212B1-8411-4ED0-877A-92E59070F518@gmx.de>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1808231719250.23215@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <CAA93jw4wxp1AbvmbqnmSOLCxnTc5G2_RSop7cv4qkecbj_T3Eg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1808262042310.23215@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <CAKxU2N80MZ982CUp2gCUe-Fwoto2ROnF=uJe7Y8d5xPPEo=7yA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAA93jw6J_5EATBJb6ZZ71AL=rga9gLcsK=08jdMuMZRsD1Ae-g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Marvell 385
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 11:33:10 -0000

On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, Dave Taht wrote:

> I was on that thread. It was broken before entirely. As for the single
> interrupt on this chip variant - believe it or not, I'm not huge on

When doing 10GE tests on x86-64 I received the highest performance when I 
set interrupt affinity to single core per interface.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se