From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 608903CB35 for ; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 05:31:32 -0400 (EDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 907BCB2; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:31:30 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1539682290; bh=0bmIQN6P/k7FwICId8KSrgHfildsfkQW7MJJljezuZU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RXmA9xdH9i9X0Njo++0AhLeVu8VskzDMCF6Pz2+qHey6UExRyOeoR0+EF1dF4qOoe lwn7NkdHGr+9SkZmPyd6MIvkTmOuRAMdWM6F9zCo5C0ZaD3Ed80KzjgaHdml2RFslH m3CuO5lxqemBjWPiaqhXgKXe2IT80c3klVh/lY/Q= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6B6B1; Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:31:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 11:31:30 +0200 (CEST) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Dave Taht cc: bloat In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Bloat] vyatta in AT&T 5G gear X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 09:31:32 -0000 On Mon, 15 Oct 2018, Dave Taht wrote: > Vyos (the open source fork of vyatta) was one of the first to add > fq_codel support... I wonder.... > > http://linuxgizmos.com/att-releases-white-box-spec-for-its-linux-based-5g-routers/ Isn't Vyos just running the Linux kernel for forwarding? So they received fq_codel for free when the Linux kernel got support for it? They just had to make it configurable? -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se