From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A78293CB3A for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 01:53:50 -0500 (EST) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 1D2B9B7; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:53:49 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1542005629; bh=ALHQOQUt+dtZ6/W5ZKk53MlCfccvNUaR6wFAJ7pIReI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:From; b=pR+NAMViRz8ypX0MmR2wF742wYAqKWAn/xV82nQH0B1Dm2ief/ghVSmeGO1R7Hof/ oi1dp5kgeEXRpcVeSZ54Xqos+k0ya3DJEZWcE683VGVS/HRnSARp7i/ZOKPLqCS/oE d5LVEKQKnzdAZJtzAzRhf4GMDhWtYH3fwQVlBa6g= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA20B6 for ; Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:53:49 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 07:53:49 +0100 (CET) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: [Bloat] excellent result with OpenWrt 18.06.1 + CAKE on FTTH X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 06:53:50 -0000 Hi, I am running "stock" OpenWrt 18.06.1 on an WRT1200AC with CAKE+piece_of_cake.qos and set to 250 down 100 up. This is on an ethernet point-to-point FTTH connection in Stockholm, Sweden. Basically just installed OpenWrt and then added the sqm-scripts-extra and luci-app-sqm packages, went in and configured the correct settings in the web UI, and then everything was great. Biggest benefit with this FTTH setup is that I don't have to experience the first-hop sceduler I had with my previous DOCSIS connection (that also sometimes didn't do advertised bandwidth so I ended up getting 10-30ms of bufferbloat). http://www.dslreports.com/speedtest/41682104 The smokeping screenshots below show the difference between DOCSIS and FTTH scheduler, but the much lower access RTT (1-2 ms ) and the lower PDV (which seems to be several ms on DOCSIS but not on my P2P FTTH). https://imgur.com/a/96dFdho Thanks everybody for the excellent packaging and ease of use for end users to get this to work. I've had this running now for 40 days without any issue. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se