From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23CC13CB35 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 06:02:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id A0B35B0; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 11:02:10 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1553335330; bh=1FmesZWQ21szWkqjfCMan4Im2jQox7b74ILQLxfI5rU=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=HsunO3Qkl5YH0Cn0BLTYEdZwgnc3hAx6rg7dbpiObgh59Uz/iyQj5NhH/2ug1P8/2 0/5sQKqBRrbPmNA1e6NNYyqUKCHc2bVymo4O4sFtNJLU+nhAf4NzrwLHFtCbLceYql rqMKTu/lZ6nLfEcBGD4DnOH4LUO7qJvGeERVhtTo= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EFCEAF; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 11:02:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 11:02:10 +0100 (CET) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Roland Bless cc: Victor Hou , bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net In-Reply-To: <00674bef-877b-3ccc-9c8e-e7e06ee8e1cd@kit.edu> Message-ID: References: <2c8ad5fe4be5c52ad1a3c2bf7f91a09a@mail.gmail.com> <00674bef-877b-3ccc-9c8e-e7e06ee8e1cd@kit.edu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Ecn-sane] [iccrg] Fwd: [tcpPrague] Implementation and experimentation of TCP Prague/L4S hackaton at IETF104 X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 10:02:12 -0000 On Sat, 23 Mar 2019, Roland Bless wrote: > I suggest to use an additional DSCP to mark L4S packets. DSCP doesn't work end-to-end on the Internet, so what you're suggesting isn't a workable solution. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se