From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 087623CB37
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 14:40:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
 id 796B7B0; Sat, 23 Mar 2019 19:40:02 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
 t=1553366402; bh=ENX8hMp8D2Ub7ajFzqlZ9/hvdD5GRy/6Xv6eTucx4sM=;
 h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=XmvOgkJya8MYrusdvmY3gDADVwX160K1K/K+OCN6or/+9+5TEzHEd4a/4tnmpunR4
 hVAsqk1Yz5nqfxz79twOjcXmc4bScKwg7l8BSN5O+bPPNRqZNfowTee+7KkpPUQ0R0
 FQ60/EAQlYyU+1SytLZxFUXh7uLXd/povRZxtzQQ=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 758CAAF;
 Sat, 23 Mar 2019 19:40:02 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 19:40:02 +0100 (CET)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Luca Muscariello <luca.muscariello@gmail.com>
cc: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>, Victor Hou <victor.hou@broadcom.com>, 
 bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
In-Reply-To: <CAHx=1M5hpbboO0EzSe_fuK6=jv-nZz=+wX-rmtN8+wYs4izMLw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903231938380.3161@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <2c8ad5fe4be5c52ad1a3c2bf7f91a09a@mail.gmail.com>
 <00674bef-877b-3ccc-9c8e-e7e06ee8e1cd@kit.edu>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1903231100410.3161@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <00a6bc91-22f2-8971-cec9-8aed615d632b@kit.edu>
 <B634F202-E883-4145-A4AD-1CDC67965206@ifi.uio.no>
 <CAHx=1M5hpbboO0EzSe_fuK6=jv-nZz=+wX-rmtN8+wYs4izMLw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Ecn-sane] [iccrg] Fwd: [tcpPrague] Implementation and
 experimentation of TCP Prague/L4S hackaton at IETF104
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2019 18:40:04 -0000

On Sat, 23 Mar 2019, Luca Muscariello wrote:

> It the app runs in the cloud and the cloud has direct peering links to 
> your branch office or SP most likely DSCP works.

Do you have numbers to back this statement up? In my experience direct 
peering links has nothing to do with this, instead remaking is done 
equally at the customer edge and peering/transit edge respectively.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se