From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E0DF3CB35
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue,  2 Apr 2019 09:34:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
 id 07071B1; Tue,  2 Apr 2019 15:34:29 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
 t=1554212069; bh=BEfAj0jeZtRaZp4dVkTwPZOdRvwJHLnQM+LXQu8FUfY=;
 h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=BYeT9VO3NHKMwI9P9KJuYPL8GuLLXkMYF/KYt7HA2eoEuznUSnSIq4liPY5MLqIHN
 MRUl9irEdsIf1KKNEGqvOm8KaR6gznLooEEMD6KQLtOVY79FyCYLg8P+evd0QdDrmv
 B4MUy2D42T6iMnWKJJn1Rw3vJE9D5Eo4DcYIGVDU=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C0CB0;
 Tue,  2 Apr 2019 15:34:29 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 15:34:28 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Ryan Mounce <ryan@mounce.com.au>
cc: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, 
 Jonathan Foulkes <jfoulkes@evenroute.com>, 
 bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAN+fvRYF2TkQxP-rC0F0d=AAHbkFvWjpeLMxhuQwxTjRHY8QEA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1904021533300.3490@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <ED9289F4-B466-432F-ABD3-C5F14EC5DAA3@gmx.de>
 <CAN+fvRYF2TkQxP-rC0F0d=AAHbkFvWjpeLMxhuQwxTjRHY8QEA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Subject: Re: [Bloat] number of home routers with ingress AQM
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 13:34:30 -0000

On Tue, 2 Apr 2019, Ryan Mounce wrote:

> L4S people are concerned by RFC 3168 / "classic" ECN bottlenecks 
> *without* fq. I don't think there would be any such ingress shapers 
> configured on home gateways. Certainly not by anyone on this list... 
> anyone running non-fq codel or flowblind cake for ingress shaping?

What you described is probably on 95% or more of egress shaping on the BNG 
and on egress shaping on HGWs in the field.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se