From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2619F3CB35
 for <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>; Tue,  2 Apr 2019 10:02:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501)
 id 8F74BB2; Tue,  2 Apr 2019 16:02:34 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail;
 t=1554213754; bh=ely+hpuINDM8numahAujAfTMw8wyNhSEfUw/YsiDYYg=;
 h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From;
 b=bPIaWsayXDWX8YbbSL3DpcRV+7j0wrdxkqHsUojge2Ho508IVxFssGzZ3ydApy9FS
 vKwAwsSuoqHAMRQsOiR1eH7QPJCmj8NhPysGFlKObK6G2YtViOhfeNM2bMK+KADQ7G
 2ZESs8VChnf2QDdIcFQyXNH/9xBRiSgsufyetYXA=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
 by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC7FB0;
 Tue,  2 Apr 2019 16:02:34 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 16:02:34 +0200 (CEST)
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Ryan Mounce <ryan@mounce.com.au>
cc: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>, 
 Jonathan Foulkes <jfoulkes@evenroute.com>, 
 bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAN+fvRY2drvGjLTPUo=xvu=QnGakMV4XrT9QADbSD+CkvdcW6g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1904021558160.3490@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <ED9289F4-B466-432F-ABD3-C5F14EC5DAA3@gmx.de>
 <CAN+fvRYF2TkQxP-rC0F0d=AAHbkFvWjpeLMxhuQwxTjRHY8QEA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1904021533300.3490@uplift.swm.pp.se>
 <CAN+fvRY2drvGjLTPUo=xvu=QnGakMV4XrT9QADbSD+CkvdcW6g@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
Subject: Re: [Bloat] number of home routers with ingress AQM
X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat <bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/options/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/pipermail/bloat>
List-Post: <mailto:bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>
List-Help: <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat>,
 <mailto:bloat-request@lists.bufferbloat.net?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2019 14:02:36 -0000

On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, Ryan Mounce wrote:

> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019 at 00:04, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> wrote:
>>
>> What you described is probably on 95% or more of egress shaping on the BNG
>> and on egress shaping on HGWs in the field.
>
> How many of these single queue deployments actually have ECN marking
> enabled? This is the really dangerous case with L4S.

I don't have numbers, but from looking at the platforms I have available 
to me, very few do ECN-marking.

Considering that Apple has been beating the ECN-enablement drum for a few 
years now, there might actually be ECN-marking deployment soon.

I'm in process of trying to figure out support for ingress/egress shaping 
and ECN marking on the most common BNG platforms, we'll see what that will 
result in.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se