From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3C243B29D for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 04:47:19 -0500 (EST) Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 5A2D2AF; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:47:17 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1614246437; bh=i/2Ye0VnpCvqiX2A6yda4DnN8g2+bs1LbZLiaRTWesg=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=1M/MUkt3FjRhsLyOUgUfHyttr6f1+GUFk0ICab6s8DwaADJp8cFMZnQPd0zxdjfVP eEEEDhMWW85tR9/mpNhBjhl2iCkhPivKenf0Y8X/Fv+rc15Z2i6hLOmL9sf70laCZm G0TU4heBWnZa0gZF5afdyGghgZCs14qgDK582XzQ= Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566299F; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:47:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:47:17 +0100 (CET) From: Mikael Abrahamsson To: Sina Khanifar cc: bloat , sam@waveform.com In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) Organization: People's Front Against WWW MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: [Bloat] Updated Bufferbloat Test X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:47:19 -0000 On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Sina Khanifar wrote: > https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat I thought I just wanted to confirm that the tool seems to accurately seems to measure even higher speeds. This is my 1000/1000 debloated with FQ_CODEL to 900/900: https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=1ad173ce-9b9f-483c-842c-ea5cc08c2ff6 This is with SQM removed: https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=67168eb7-f7e2-44eb-9720-0dd52c725e8c My ISP has told me that they have a 10ms FIFO in my downstream direction, and openwrt defaults with FQ_CODEL in the upstream direction, and this seems to be accurately reflected in what the tool shows. Also my APU2 can't really keep up with 900/900 I think, because when I set SQM to 500/500 I get very tightly controlled PDV: https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=58626d8c-2eea-43f9-9904-b1ec43f28235 Tool looks good, I like it! Thanks! -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se