From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Sebastian Moeller <moeller0@gmx.de>
Cc: Mikael Abrahamsson via Bloat <bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net>,
Jonathan Morton <chromatix99@gmail.com>,
starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net, dickroy@alum.mit.edu
Subject: Re: [Bloat] [Starlink] Of interest: Comcast AQM Paper
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2021 15:06:40 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.2108041504480.13354@uplift.swm.pp.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5C65BC6E-1ABD-4432-B2CE-AC8BACDA363D@gmx.de>
On Wed, 4 Aug 2021, Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> I guess the point is AQM is not really that expensive, even FQ AQM,
> traffic shaping however is expensive. But for wifi shaping is not
> required so AQM became feasible.
My point is that CPU based forwarding has very bad performance on some
platforms, regardless if you're doing shaping, AQM or none of them (FIFO).
If it's not hw accelerated, it sucks.
When I did tests on MT7621 it did ~100 meg/s without flow-offload, and
full gig with it.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-08-04 13:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-01 20:20 [Bloat] " Livingood, Jason
2021-08-01 21:39 ` [Bloat] [Starlink] " Dick Roy
2021-08-04 11:49 ` Jonathan Morton
2021-08-04 12:46 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2021-08-04 13:03 ` Sebastian Moeller
2021-08-04 13:06 ` Mikael Abrahamsson [this message]
2021-08-04 13:43 ` Sebastian Moeller
2021-08-04 18:28 ` Jonathan Morton
2021-08-04 20:44 ` David Lang
2021-08-04 20:51 ` Sebastian Moeller
2021-08-04 18:31 ` Juliusz Chroboczek
2021-08-04 18:58 ` Jonathan Morton
2021-08-04 20:08 ` Jonathan Bennett
2021-08-04 20:18 ` Nathan Owens
2021-08-04 20:46 ` Jonathan Bennett
2021-08-05 0:24 ` Michael Richardson
2021-08-07 20:31 ` Dave Taht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://lists.bufferbloat.net/postorius/lists/bloat.lists.bufferbloat.net/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.2108041504480.13354@uplift.swm.pp.se \
--to=swmike@swm.pp.se \
--cc=bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net \
--cc=chromatix99@gmail.com \
--cc=dickroy@alum.mit.edu \
--cc=moeller0@gmx.de \
--cc=starlink@lists.bufferbloat.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox