From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net (resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe16:19:96:114:154:162]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.bufferbloat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B43003B29D for ; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 00:29:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from resomta-po-20v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.244]) by resqmta-po-03v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTP id F9C3lZAXGTnSbF9Djli7Cb; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 05:29:51 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcastmailservice.net; s=20180828_2048; t=1614230991; bh=utUIvUV+xrhZHt+UeVUlDyVSF3OnE1YAHJpZXDQsKbg=; h=Received:Received:Received:Subject:To:From:Message-ID:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lnzDeVg6J0YP38exIAL1U13ONPlb5LercYLs2vqaHJTF7li+bOUXWQGj3ZmETa6ft U5a05WOyW1XEaI3Yei9H/TJtI1i/B4X67+hZt2fYmRNuHkWxqf/ui3cAyCt/4sbpE4 hmfP/uhTRSdyjKnNfZtg8HHmqfmM26qnr7mAeX/rBoywH9ho1Q3fpoOPwZ02mLmh7+ yp4bAfgOj7nJtoBOb6pdhqr0g3rGyqpv0wERoyrrvA12E4vpWVNGWTH0j6+Yaw4IQx ZFreJm1vlh6Zw/RGfF51f1ef97zWGR9HhnCxmhqA8JT0yejjYiJuYWN/xoHLmsDeKM 499MkHHiqeHXQ== Received: from home.sewingwitch.com ([IPv6:2601:644:881:42b0::3f1]) by resomta-po-20v.sys.comcast.net with ESMTPA id F9Dcl8Ij8NTEVF9Djl3mPw; Thu, 25 Feb 2021 05:29:51 +0000 X-Xfinity-VMeta: sc=0.00;st=legit Received: from [10.169.5.30] (saruman.microprecisionautomation.com [12.3.140.156]) (authenticated bits=0) by home.sewingwitch.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 11P5TOOO017893 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:29:31 -0800 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 home.sewingwitch.com 11P5TOOO017893 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sewingwitch.com; s=default; t=1614230971; bh=utUIvUV+xrhZHt+UeVUlDyVSF3OnE1YAHJpZXDQsKbg=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=otxQOFovDlKZc7+k3XKuYSvdUXxfVXjE3EFTps+VeqNZQeksS6K6n2ommz4PrpSxu 4+V8XhIgq7tXlIcpy44x0qbGGvsJZ4RNk1BalpjhARlvDvkX/ifTp16CH8TMDEVea5 sVkGoRIaXwJqG0j8xhX4S+s9t1E7Yx25wAe7prX4= To: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net References: <1D68EF40C3A8A269831408C8@[172.27.17.193]> From: Kenneth Porter Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 21:29:21 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1D68EF40C3A8A269831408C8@[172.27.17.193]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.96.0.132 Subject: Re: [Bloat] Updated Bufferbloat Test X-BeenThere: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: General list for discussing Bufferbloat List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 05:29:52 -0000 On 2/24/2021 2:15 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote: > > I'll try to remember to run this from my office tonight when nobody's > around. We've got a 50 Mbps fiber connection with AT&T and I'm using > fq_codel on a CentOS 7 system for the SQM. That should be interesting. https://www.waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat?test-id=494dbe95-5302-4e1c-84cd-fbb4c8871ea2 This is after restarting the sqm-scripts. I got initial bad results and looked at the debug log and found that the iptables commands were failing to get a lock during system boot to set up the mangle table. I think it's competing with firewalld and fail2ban and losing. I don't see any lock errors from the restart and now the test shows good bloat results.